Circuit: Time Constant, Net Charge in Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time constant, voltage, and net charge in an RC circuit after a switch is closed. The time constant was calculated as 12 ms, and the time to reach 6 V was found to be approximately 8.316 ms. There was confusion regarding the correct use of equations, particularly in distinguishing between voltage and charge. For the net charge after 10 nanoseconds, a calculation yielded approximately 9E-5 μC, but there was uncertainty about whether this represented the net charge or the charge that moved. Clarification was sought on the terminology used in the problem, specifically regarding "net charge."
ChelsM
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the circuit below, at time t = 0, the switch is closed, causing the capacitors to charge. The voltage across the battery is 12 V. **Image of circuit is attached.

A)Calculate the time constant for the RC circuit
B)Calculate the time required for the voltage across the capacitor to reach 6 V
C)What will be the net charge stored in the capacitor after 10 nanoseconds?


Homework Equations



Time constant (TC)= R*C
q= qo[1-e^(-t/TC)]

The Attempt at a Solution



A)
TC= [(C1+C2)*(R1*R2)]/(R1+R2)
TC= [(3μF+6μF)*(4kΩ*2kΩ)]/(4kΩ+2kΩ)
TC= 12 ms = 0.012 sec Correct/Incorrect?

B)
q= qo[1-e^(-t/TC)]
6= 12[1-e^(-t/12)]
t= 8.316 ms = 0.008316 sec Correct/Incorrect? Also unsure about my set-up and math.

C) I cannot find an equation to solve for this and don't know how. Please Help!
 

Attachments

  • Circuit.jpg
    Circuit.jpg
    17.6 KB · Views: 599
Physics news on Phys.org
Dont got a calc. but time constant is something with 12 so I am going to trust your digits.

On b) the voltage drop across the capacitors at time 0 is zero. Remember when you connect this circuit no charge build up has occurred across the capacitors so there can be no pot. diff V, across the capacitors. So are you using the right exponential equation? There should be a voltage build up thru time that reaches some max. value at time = ∞; not a decrease in voltage...I see also you are using q instead of V.
And do you know the max value for voltage across the capacitors since you also have a voltage drop at the resistors?

c) And this is a conceptual question I am thinkin since it says net charge. If one + charge is placed on one plate, then one + charge leaves the other plate... yes? and the capacitor has built a small charge diff, thus a small voltage difference, this keeps happening thru time and you get a larger separation of charge, but net charge...? (This assumes conventional current as it is actually electrons acting as current)
 
Last edited:
I get the same as you for the time constant and the time to reach 6V.
6V is half the final voltage and there is a short cut if t = T/2.
the 'half time' = 0.693xtime constant...t1/2 = Ln(2) x time constant
 
emily has given you b basically

And you were using the right equation

And the reason you use 12V as V initial is that at t=∞ the current will approach zero (which they might have you know and uses a slightly diff exp. equation) so the resistors have no current flowing through them (or approach this) and the battery and capacitor must have the same diff in potential, only opposite in direction.

And c...
 
Thanks for your responses. I think I might have part C. What I did was use this equation again: q= q0[1-e^(-t/TC)].

q0= CeqV
q0= (9μF)*(12V)
q0= 108 μC

q= q0[1-e^(-t/TC)]
q= 108[1-e^(-0.00001/12)] 10 nanoseconds= 0.00001 milliseconds
q= 9E-5 μC

Does this seem reasonable?
 
I think that you are trying to calculate the amount of charge that moved after a short period of time.

Its says net charge. So if one plate has a certain negative charge, then the opposing plate must have the same + charge. So there is a voltage across the two plates, but net charge?

So I am not sure which one they want. If it said how much charge moved or the net charge on one plate, same thing, it would be clearer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top