Circuit - Why a more accurate value of the resistance?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the accuracy of resistance measurements in circuit setups. In the first setup, the ammeter measures total current, including that through the voltmeter, leading to inaccurate resistance readings. Conversely, the second setup allows the ammeter to measure only the current through the wire, providing a more precise resistance value. The presence of the voltmeter's high internal resistance and the ammeter's low internal resistance further complicates measurements. Understanding the distinction between series and parallel connections is crucial for accurate circuit analysis.
vadevalor
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Circuit -- Why a more accurate value of the resistance?

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1353944606.942928.jpg


Note: CURRENT CAN FLOW THROUGH THE VOLTMETER IN THESE CASES.
Why does the second setup as shown by the arrow in the picture give a more accurate value of the resistance of that wire?

It says the current in setup 1 on the left measured by the ammeter includes both the current through the wire and current through the voltmeter,
but for setup 2 on the right, it says this setup the ammeter will measure the current in the wire only.

They are both series circuits, so i can't get why there is a difference in currents for the 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The image on the left does not have the wire and ammeter in series. They are in series on the right.

In case you are not confused enough, the ammeter has a tiny internal series resistance. The voltmeter has a large shunt (parallel) internal resistance (this is why a tiny amount of current can flow through the voltmeter). Their presence in your circuit affects the circuit. For high-quality meters, the effect is negligible (measurement error is within the meter's specified uncertainty).
 
Why is the wire and ammeter not in series? Well i see the voltmeter as a separate entity, and its a complete rectangle circuit to me :0 i understand you :P

Parallel should be like on different lines right? ( in layman's term) one on a line in a small rectangle, one on a line in a big rectangle (where rectangle is the circuit)
 


Two elements are in series if the node (wire) that connects them has no branches. Series elements will have the same current going through them.

Two elements are in parallel if they are both connected across 2 nodes (wires). These nodes may have branches (unlike the node joining the two series elements). Parallel elements will have the same voltage across them.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top