Circuit with resistors in series and two power supplies

AI Thread Summary
The circuit analysis reveals that the effective voltage is not the sum of the two power supplies, but rather the difference, resulting in 6 volts. Using Kirchhoff's voltage law, the total resistance in the circuit was recalculated, leading to the conclusion that the resistance R is 6 ohms. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding how opposing voltages from batteries affect the circuit's behavior. Several users contributed to clarifying the calculations and the correct approach to analyzing the circuit. Ultimately, the effective voltage and resistance values were established through collaborative problem-solving.
743344
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a current of 0.25 A in the circuit of the figure

knight_Figure_31_50.jpg


What is the value of the resistance R?


Homework Equations




V = IR


The Attempt at a Solution



since the circuit is in series:

V = 6+ 12 = 18V
Req = R + 6 + 12
V = IReq
Req = 18/0.25 = 72

72 = 18+ R
R = 54

but the answer is wrong !
help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is the answer 30?
 
current of the whole circuit =0.25A

I=V/R = (12-6)/(18+R) = 6/(18+R)
4.5+0.25R=6
0.25R=1.5
R=6 ?
I am not sure ...
 
I'm sure you know Kirchoff's voltage law - "The sum of all voltage drops around any closed loop must be equal to zero.

Applying Kirchoff's voltage law gives ->
0 = Power supply driving current (largest voltage) - Power supply opposing flow of current (smallest voltage) - Voltage drop across resistance in circuit (6Ohm, 12Ohm and ROhm).

0 = 12 - 6 -(6*0.25) - (12*0.25) - 0.25R
Thus..
0 = 6 - 1.5 - 3 - 0.25R
So..
0= 1.5 - 0.25R
0.25R = 1.5
R = 6Ohms
 
Ohm's law is something in this world i guess...
 
Ohm's law is something i guess.
 
Ohms law is something - but in this case Kirchoff's voltage law is something also.
 
Utility of the either one counts.
 
My take on this is that because there is a charge flow from the 12V battery and the potential of this battery is higher than the 6V, the 6V does not release any electrons at all and acts as a conductor.
 
  • #10
the circuit is an illusion.

the effective voltage is not 18 volts, it is 6 volts.

redrawing circuit with resistors in one leg and batteries
in another gives a better understanding of actual circuit.

6 ohm 12 ohm Rx
+----VVVV----VVVV----VVVV---+
| |
__|__ + | E/I = Rt
___ 12 V | 6V/.25A = 24 OHM total
_____ | therefore;
___ | 6 + 12 + Rx = 24 OHM
| | Rx = 6 OHM
| 6 volts effective |
_|_ |
_____ |
___ |
_____ 6 V |
| + |
| |
+-------------------------------------+
 
  • #11
please excuse previous post. seems that character graphics can not be used on this forum.

repeating text of previous post and adding a graphic to show redrawn circuit.

++++
the circuit is an illusion.

when 2 batteries connected with like polarities connected cause lesser voltage to be subtracted
from higher voltage. therefore, the effective voltage is not 6 volts + 12 volts = 18 volts.

it is 12 volts - 6 volts = 6 volts.


attached redrawing of circuit with resistors in one leg and batteries in another leg
gives a better of what is actual circuit.

using formula,
E/I = Rt
6V/.25A = 24 OHM total
therefore;
6 + 12 + Rx = 24 OHM
Rx = 6 OHM
 
  • #12
geleem said:
when 2 batteries connected with like polarities connected cause lesser voltage to be subtracted
from higher voltage. therefore, the effective voltage is not 6 volts + 12 volts = 18 volts.

it is 12 volts - 6 volts = 6 volts.

You are right. A person should go around the loop in one direction, say, arbitrarily choosing clockwise. Then we would encounter one battery in the polarity plus-minus and we would encounter the other battery in the polarity minus-plus. Therefore the batteries oppose one another. We have to subtract the batteries, not add them.
 
  • #13
mikelepore said:
A person should go around the loop in one direction, say, arbitrarily choosing clockwise.

this is true. considering as a loop is one way to look at it.

when i first looked at circuit, i saw reason "743344"'s formula did not work just from fact being that
'load' side, [normal of convention of supply to left, load to right of a circuit] had an opposing voltage.

"mysqlpress" replied with correct answer in formula without a corrected drawing.

"Mike Cookson" replied with an implication of "Kirchoff's voltage law", no drawing.

24 Dec 2009, 06:48 PM UTC, i attempted an 'ascii graphic' of circuit, which failed due to
compressing of spaces used.

after seeing this, i submitted again, 24 Dec 2009, 07:46 PM UTC, with an 'attached' drawing,
which for some reason or other, did not get shown. [i just now tried an edit and was able to get
attachment to save]

all in all, another way to spend December 24th UTC.

happy Christmas to all.
 

Attachments

  • series_circuit-0021.png
    series_circuit-0021.png
    15.3 KB · Views: 635
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top