Circular Motion Conceptual Physics - Space Station

AI Thread Summary
To determine your weight in a circular space station revolving at 290 m/s with a radius of 8784 meters, first calculate the centripetal acceleration using the formula v^2/r, which yields 9.57 m/s². This value is then compared to Earth's gravitational acceleration, approximately 9.81 m/s². The comparison shows that the acceleration in the space station is about 0.975 times that of Earth's gravity. Consequently, to find your weight in the space station, multiply your Earth weight by this ratio. This approach allows for the calculation of effective weight in a non-Earth gravitational environment.
Dysprositos
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose you are standing within the rim of a circular space station, in outer space. The rim revolves around the center of the space station at 290 m/s. If the radius of the station is 8784 meters, what will you weigh? (Hint: Find v^2/r and compare it to g.)

Homework Equations


v^2/r=a
F=m*v^2/r
a=(4╥^2)/t^2

The Attempt at a Solution


2902 m/s /8784 m =9.57 m/s2 What do I do with this now?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I quote from your original statement of the problem:
(Hint: Find v^2/r and compare it to g.)

Since you've done the first part, now go for the second.
 
ok. How do I compare it to g? Isn't 9.57 m/s2 g? I know the acceleration of gravity on Earth is 9.81 m/s2. I am stuck on how I am supposed to compare it to find my mass?
 
Right, g is ~9.81m/s^2. And for your acceleration, you get 9.57m/s^2. How do the two compare? You're looking for a statement like: The acceleration is .75 x g (.75 made up), or simply .75g. And since g determines weight on earth, you can figure out your "weight" in this accelerating environment from the same conversion factor.
 
Nabeshin said:
Right, g is ~9.81m/s^2. And for your acceleration, you get 9.57m/s^2. How do the two compare? You're looking for a statement like: The acceleration is .75 x g (.75 made up), or simply .75g. And since g determines weight on earth, you can figure out your "weight" in this accelerating environment from the same conversion factor.
Okay thanks a lot!:smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top