What Are the Correct Calculations for a Geosynchronous Satellite's Orbit?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force acting on a geosynchronous satellite and determining the mass of the planet it orbits. The satellite's orbital speed was calculated to be approximately 14617.1 m/s, leading to a planet mass of about 6.43615 × 10^26 kg. A participant suggested using the formula F = m(v^2/r) for calculating the force, which resulted in a value of approximately 1.016 kN, significantly lower than the initial calculation. The use of 86400 seconds, representing 24 hours, in the force equation was clarified as necessary for accurate calculations. The final consensus indicates that the recalculated force is around 1016.21 N, confirming the need for careful verification of calculations.
jj8890
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Circular orbit question...please check answers

Homework Statement


Given: G = 6.67259 × 10^-11 N m^2/kg^2 .
A 956 kg geosynchronous satellite orbits a planet similar to Earth at a radius 201000 km
from the planet’s center. Its angular speed at this radius is the same as the rotational speed of the Earth, and so they appear stationary in the sky. That is, the period of the satelliteis 24 h .

What is the force acting on this satellite? (Newtons)
What is the mass of this planet? (kgs)

I just need help checking my answers and make sure that I am using the correct equations. I would appreciate the help.

Homework Equations


v= (2*pi*R)/T
v= (Sqrt(G * Mcentral))/R; G=6.67259 *10^-11
F=(GmM)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


v= (2*pi*R)/T = (2*pi*201,000,000)/86400 = 14617.1 m/s

v= (Sqrt(G * Mcentral)); (v^2 *r)/G=Mcentral
Mcentral= (14617.1^2 * 201,000,000)/(6.67259 *10^-11)= 6.43615 * 10^26 kg

F=(GmM)/r^2
F= [(6.67259*10^-11) * (956) * (6.43615 *10^26)]/(86400^2)=5.49985 *10^9 N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did the 86400 come from in your force equation?

Your speed seems fine, and I would probably use F=m\frac{v^2}{r} for the force due to circular motion, which gives 1.016 kN. The mass of the planet is then 643*10^24 kg, as you have.

Recheck your force.
 
The 86400 = 24 hrs in seconds, the period. I also thought that the force was high...I'll recalculate.
 
I also got 1016.21 N when recalculated...thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top