Clipper circuit: Sign of output voltage

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the clipper circuit, it is clarified that when the input voltage (Vin) is positive, the diode is reverse biased, resulting in the output voltage (Vo) being equal to Vin. Conversely, when Vin is negative, the diode becomes forward biased, leading to Vo being zero. The confusion arises from the assumption that Vo and Vin must have opposite polarities to satisfy Kirchhoff's Law, which is incorrect in this context. The waveform analysis indicates that Vo is indeed equal to Vin, creating a misunderstanding that led to exam failure. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding basic electronics principles, including the implications of voltage polarity and Kirchhoff's Law in circuit analysis.
iampaul
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
I have attached the image of the clipper circuit below.
When Vin is positive the diode is reverse biased and the output and input are at the same loop. When Vin is negative the diode is forward biased and Vo=0.
My problem is finding the sign of the output, although I know that Vo and Vin are numerically equal. The output waveform of this clipper circuit shows that Vo= Vin. My question is why. If we consider the loop containing Vo and Vin, they must be of opposite polarity so that the sum of the voltages around the loop is zero. If they are equal then the sum of all voltages around the loop is not zero. i have failed an exam just because of this.The waveform i get is the exact opposite of the real one because i think that Vo=-Vin.
We are being taught basic electronics and dc circuits at the same time, and i think dc and ac circuits must be a prerequisite of this electronics course. Is this ok.
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
A wire cannot have more than one voltage on it at the same time.

So, the input voltage and polarity in the diagram have to be the same.

Viewed in parallel like this, they do have the same voltage and polarity (although this may spell trouble for the diode) but if you move around the circle formed by the input voltage and the diode, then you have a source voltage and opposing it you have a voltage across a diode. This gives no net voltage around the circle.

Kirchoff's Law is safe. It would still be safe if you added a resistor in series with the diode.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top