Why Is the Coefficient of Restitution Less Than 1 in a Tennis Racket Collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of restitution (COR) in a tennis racket collision, specifically when a ball traveling at 10 m/s hits a stationary racket. The COR is incorrectly calculated by the original poster, leading to a value greater than 1, which is impossible. The correct formula requires using the relative speeds after and before the collision, with attention to the direction of the velocities. The mistake involves the order of velocities and the sign, which must be reversed to obtain the correct COR. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
charlie1990
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. calculate the coefficient of restitution when a player hits a ball traveling into a racket at 10m/s and the racket is stationary before the ball hits it. after the ball hits it, the ball has a velocity of 5m/s and the racket is moving in the opposite direction at 1 m/s (Velocity before a - velocity before b)/(Velocity after a - velocity after b)
I know this is what's used to get the answer normally, but I am getting the wrong answer (above 1).


I think it has something to do with racket going opposite direction but not sure what to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
charlie1990 said:
(Velocity before a - velocity before b)/(Velocity after a - velocity after b)
You have that a bit backwards (or upside down). You want the relative speed after the collision over the relative speed before the collision.
 
Doc Al said:
You have that a bit backwards (or upside down). You want the relative speed after the collision over the relative speed before the collision.
cheers, poor mistake
 
charlie1990 said:
cheers, poor mistake
... and the sign reverses.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top