Coefficient of Friction (Styrofoam on Water)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the coefficient of friction for a styrofoam object on water. The participant outlines the gravitational force and net force equations but encounters confusion regarding the calculations, particularly noting a discrepancy in the net force value. They question whether friction is the only force acting on the styrofoam or if other forces are involved, which complicates the analysis. The conversation emphasizes the need to clarify the forces at play to accurately determine the coefficient of friction. The participant is seeking guidance on resolving these mathematical inconsistencies and understanding the forces involved.
dashed
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



fgrav = mg
fgrav = (0.0821)(9.8) = 0.80458 N

fnet = ma = (0.0821)(0.0096) = 0.0096 m/s^2

fnorm = fgrav

Homework Equations



kinetic mew = force of friction / fnorm

The Attempt at a Solution



Required: Ffr

kinetic mew = force of friction / fnorm
kinetic mew = force of friction / 0.80458 N

I need to find the friction of the object when it is on the water. The object is made out of styrofoam. I'm completely stumped and I tried looking around internet using the google search engine to find the coefficient of friction of two surfaces.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dashed said:

Homework Statement




fnet = ma = (0.0821)(0.0096) = 0.0096 m/s^2

This does not make much sense...mathematically, it is not true. (0.0821)(0.0096) = 0.00079.

Also...what forces are acting on this styrofoam contributing to fnet? is friction the only force and the styrofoam is actually slowing down? Or are there other forces involved?

If it is the first case, then 0.00079 = force of friction and "mu" can be calculated as per the equation you show. If it is the second case, the force of friction can be calculated using the fnet equation and the values of the other forces involved.
 
Galileo's Ghost said:
This does not make much sense...mathematically, it is not true. (0.0821)(0.0096) = 0.00079.

Also...what forces are acting on this styrofoam contributing to fnet? is friction the only force and the styrofoam is actually slowing down? Or are there other forces involved?

If it is the first case, then 0.00079 = force of friction and "mu" can be calculated as per the equation you show. If it is the second case, the force of friction can be calculated using the fnet equation and the values of the other forces involved.

there is Fa which is opposite of Ffr. However at the moment Fa is unknown.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top