Collapsing fields and coil polarity, freewheel diode, .

AI Thread Summary
When a DC coil is de-energized, the collapsing magnetic field induces a current that opposes the change, which can initially seem to flow in the same direction as when the coil was energized. However, this induced current causes the polarity across the coil to reverse, making the coil act as a power source. The voltage spike observed is of opposite polarity to that during steady-state energization. This phenomenon is similar to the behavior of a transformer, where the secondary voltage can be out of phase with the primary when the circuit is open. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effectively managing inductive loads and preventing voltage spikes in circuits.
mmalf_mi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
When a DC coil (relay) is denergized, shouldn't the collapsing field cause a current that would oppose the change in current? Wouldn't that induced current be in the same direction as when the coil was enegized? Not seeing how a freewheeling doide gets forward biased. If I apply Lenz Law, current will flow in a direction that will oppose the force that caused it. The collapsing field caused it (denergizing the coil), the current direction to oppose the collapsing field would be the same current direction that caused an expanding field (energizing the coil). Shouldn't there be a voltage spike across the coil with the same polarity as when the coil field was energized and steady state?

Please shed some light on this EET.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

You generally seem to have the right idea.
However, note that when the current going to the coil is turned off the coil becomes a power source.
So with the external drive terminal 1 is at a higher voltage potential than terminal 2.
With the drive turned off terminal 2 is staying at the same (for illustration) voltage (because the coil continues the current) while terminal 1 is now at a zero potential.
The relative polarity across the coil reverses.
 
NoTime,
Thanks for your response. Is this the same as when the secondary voltage of a transformer is 180 degrees out of phase with the primary and the secondary has no load? We read a voltage because the induced secondary circuit is not closed, but electrons have still moved to one side of the wire's end (the - side means excess of electrons), and the other end now has fewer electrons (the + side). Lenz Law would still prevail, the collapsing field would try to oppose the decreasing current by boosting the current in the same direction as when the switch was closed on the coil. However, there is not a closed circuit for current to flow, it just moves electrons to one end and creates a potential difference.

I got this from another website. I did not think it was a good technical response:

"However, when the switch is opened, the coil's inductance responds to the decrease in current by inducing a voltage of reverse polarity, in an effort to maintain current at the same magnitude and in the same direction."

Great to have people to go to. Thanks again.
mmalf_mi
 
For a transformer secondary with switched DC.
When the switch is closed you will get a voltage in one polarity.
When the current in the primary reaches the limit defined by E/R then the secondary voltage is zero.
Just what you get when the the switch is opened depends on what the primary circuit is (with the switch open), but the initial voltage pulse will have the opposite polarity.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top