[College Electrical Engineering/Physics] Waves & Lens

DerpyDalek
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that when a plane wave is transmitted through a thin lens of focal length f in a direction parallel to the axis of the lens, it is converted into a paraboloidal wave (the Fresnel approximation of a spherical wave) centered about a point at a distance f from the lens.

Homework Equations



U(r) = (Ao/z)exp(-jkz)exp[-jk(x^2 + y^2)/2z]

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble determining how to best set up this problem, i understand visually why this occurs as a plane wave contacts a thin lens and transforms but am having problems seeing the math to "prove" that this is what occurs.

Currently looking into how the lens affects the speed of light as it passes through each point of the lens at the front of the wave
 

Attachments

  • 20140212_050359_resized.jpg
    20140212_050359_resized.jpg
    31.4 KB · Views: 980
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use 2 dimensions to start. You should be able to show by analytic geometry that the locus of off-axis rays impinging on the focal plane is a parabola. Then extend the argument to 3 dimensions.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top