Collimating light from diffraction grating

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of a thin lens equation to determine the position of the line focus after light diffracts through a diffraction grating. The user notes that the thin lens equation does not yield the expected results for the focus position, which is experimentally verified to be at 0.7m. They express confusion over treating the diffraction grating as a point source and seek clarification on the appropriate equations to use. Additionally, the user inquires whether the type of lens, specifically a plano-convex lens, affects the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the need for a better understanding of the relationship between the diffraction grating and the lens system in this optical setup.
$id
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the following, A collimated light source impinges on a plane diffraction grating and diffracts via the well known diffraction equation. The diffracted light is then collimated by a 1 metre focal length lens (good quality one). It is experimentally verified that the line focus(fourier plane) is at 0.7m if the distance between the grating and lens is 0.3m.

Now is the time for a silly question. I've tried to use thin lens equation 1/image + 1/object = 1/focal length but this clearly doesn't solve the problem above. Any ideas which equation I should be using? I assumed diffraction grating as a point source of light with some divergence. I know I am making the mistake somewhere but not sure.

I am using a plano convex lens. Does this matter?

Edit/ I've added the diagram now to make it clear. what is the relationship between x an y in this configuration.

Homework Equations



I think thin lens equation and grating equation are well known already.

The Attempt at a Solution



As mentioned already , the thins equation doesn't correctly predict the position of the line focus(fourier plane).
 

Attachments

  • diffractionproblem.jpg
    diffractionproblem.jpg
    15.4 KB · Views: 1,009
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any ideas chaps?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top