Comments - Publishing in a Physics Journal (Addendum)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the publication process of significant physics research, particularly the Higgs boson discovery papers. ZapperZ highlights the embargo policies that affected how these groundbreaking results were shared. Both the ATLAS and CMS results were published simultaneously in Physical Review Letters (PRL B), while journals like Nature and Science expressed interest in the findings. The ATLAS and CMS collaborations produced additional papers for Science, aimed at a broader scientific audience, which caused some frustration for Nature. A key takeaway is the importance of embargo adherence, as presenting findings at conferences can inadvertently breach these restrictions if media coverage occurs.
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,814
Reaction score
4,725
ZapperZ submitted a new PF Insights post

Publishing in a Physics Journal (Addendum)

physicsjournals2-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Higgs boson discovery papers had some interesting history concerning the embargo policies as far as I heard, but I don't know details. Both papers appeared in PRL B, while Nature and Science were certainly interested in those extremely influential papers. Reporting it at a conference without getting media attention was impossible, of course.
 
The ATLAS and CMS Higgs results were published back-to-back in PLB. There was also a set of three papers (An overview, and a summary of the ATLAS and CMS results) in Science, which were written at a different level: intended for scientists who are not physicists. These were written at Science's request,

Nature was somewhat annoyed, bur the position of the experiments was that PLB was there for us when we were publishing papers that were "dull but important".
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
Very useful information - I had not realized that one would be accidentally violating the embargo if the press reported on a conference presentation!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
12K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top