Comparing Round & Square Pipes: Strength & OD, Thickness

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the strength comparison between hollow round tubes of different outer diameters (OD) and wall thicknesses. A hollow round tube with a 15.88mm OD and 1.2mm wall thickness is compared to a 19.08mm OD tube with a 1.0mm thickness, both weighing the same per meter. For internal pressure resistance, the thicker-walled, smaller diameter tube is stronger due to more material resisting splitting forces. Conversely, for bending moments, the larger diameter tube is stronger as it has material positioned farther from the neutral axis, allowing it to resist greater moments. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the specific application and the type of strength required.
raj001
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
what are the principles regarding pipe OD, thickness & strength as well regarding round and square which one is more stronger. This matter came up becoz there are certain sizes of OD not available in HR but only available in CR, on the other hand there are certain sizes which we can convert form round to square to save material or increase strength. Pls note that we have to find out the following regarding Pipes -

1. If we make a Hollow Round Tube of 15.88mm OD and 1.2mm Wall Thickness, means a weight of 470gm per mtr. Keeping the same weight per mtr, if we make Holow Tube of 19.08mm OD then its thickness will be 1.0mm.

Now our question is, which Hollow Tube will be stronger? Which will bend less when put same pressure on same length? The Tube with 15.88mm OD or with 19.08mm OD as the material used in both of them is same?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
raj001 said:
1. If we make a Hollow Round Tube of 15.88mm OD and 1.2mm Wall Thickness, means a weight of 470gm per mtr. Keeping the same weight per mtr, if we make Holow Tube of 19.08mm OD then its thickness will be 1.0mm.

Now our question is, which Hollow Tube will be stronger? Which will bend less when put same pressure on same length? The Tube with 15.88mm OD or with 19.08mm OD as the material used in both of them is same?
Stronger in what sense? Generally when we speak of the 'strength' of a pipe, we're referring to its ability to resist internal pressure. But we might also be thinking of using a pipe to make some kind of framework in which it must resist a bending moment.

For the case of internal pressure, a thicker wall and smaller diameter is stronger because there is more material to resist the forces that tend to split the pipe (ie: lower force per unit area of material).

For the case of a bending moment in a pipe, the thinner wall and larger OD is stronger (up to the point where buckling becomes the primary failure mechanism) because there is more material farther away from the point of bending (called a 'neutral axis) and this allows for larger moments to be resisted in the same way that less force is needed on a longer lever arm to produce the same moment around a fulcrum.
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top