Complete vaporization time of water into superheated steam - DESUPERHEATER

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the position and time for complete evaporation of water injected into superheated steam, emphasizing the importance of avoiding water droplets at the thermocouple's location. Participants highlight the need for specific details about flow conditions, such as orientation and droplet size, which are crucial for accurate calculations. It is suggested that using empirical data from similar desuperheater systems may yield better results than theoretical calculations due to the complexity and variability of the system. The conversation also mentions the potential for paralysis by analysis when attempting to account for numerous variables. Ultimately, practical insights from existing systems may provide a more effective solution than manual calculations.
SimonTecnoil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi to all...i've a problem. i have to calculate the position and the time of complete evaporation of a continuous water flow which is injected trough a nozzle into a continuous flow of steam in superheated condition. The position (and than the time) at which I'm sure that there aren't water droplets is really important, 'cause I've to choose the position of a thermocouple which detects the effetc in temperature of the desuperheating stage. Clearly, the measurement of the thermocouple is wrong if is reached by water droplets.

I know all the macroscopic thermodynamic conditions of the system.

In your opinion, i have to consider the water flow according to a continuous or discrete approach? And if discrete...how i could manually calculate the diameter of the droplets of water?

I don't want to use CFD!

Could someone suggest a theoretic approach to the problem?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
ping @Chestermiller , @jrmichler This is a spring cleaning post from 2010. It sounds like an interesting question. Thermo, but not thermo because it would have to do with drop size distribution and velocity.

Perhaps he could estimate the worst case with the largest drop moving at the highest velocity.
 
Whoops, ping @russ_watters also.
 
It seems to me that there is not enough information provided to suggest a reasonable approach to this. There isn't even an indication of whether the flow is horizontal or vertical, and whether the drops are large enough for gravity to play a role. There is also no indication of the ratio of the inlet flow rates or the degree of superheating and/or subcooling.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
A desuperheater sprays water into a steam line to reduce the steam temperature down to somewhat above the saturation temperature. Typically (and ideally), the water is condensate at 90 to 100 deg C. Normally the steam velocity is high enough, and the droplet size small enough, to carry the water droplets in suspension. The water flow rate is controlled by the temperature of the desuperheated steam, hence the need to measure the steam temperature. The temperature sensor needs to be far enough downstream that the water is all evaporated, but not so far as to create a time lag in the control system. The desuperheater systems that I worked with had water flow rates from near zero with the steam turbine running, to quite high when the steam turbine was down.

If you really want to calculate droplet evaporation time, the spray nozzle manufacturer can supply droplet size information. The temperature difference will decrease as the droplets get smaller. The droplet size will change with water flow rate. Attempting to calculate the evaporation distance can easily turn into an exercise of paralysis by analysis because of the number of variables and unknowns.

A much easier approach is to find a desuperheater system of similar size and capacity, then ask how far downstream they put their temperature sensor. That approach will almost certainly give better results than a theoretical calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top