Complex numbers and Argan Diagram

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about complex numbers and the Argand diagram, the user seeks help to find the coordinates of points B and D given a rectangle ABCD with specific properties. They have derived an equation involving x and y but encountered difficulties in solving it. Responses suggest that the user should focus on the relationship AB=2CB and correctly equate the magnitude of AB to the derived equation for its coordinates. The advice emphasizes the importance of using the right equations and checking calculations to find the correct values for B and D. Clarifying these steps is crucial for resolving the user's problem effectively.
coffeebeans
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I desperately need help with this qns:
In an Argan Diagram, the points A, B, C, D represent the copmlex numbers a,b,c,d respectively. Guiven that ABCD is a rectangle describd in an anticlocwise sense, with AB=2CB, and a=-2-i, c=3+5i, find b and d
(AB and CD are not parallel to the xaxis)

I've tried using dot product and gradient method, by letting B be (x,y), it all comes down to the equation y^2-4y-5+x^2-6-x=0 ---- (1)

|AC| = sqrt 61, and since ABC makes a right angled triangle, CB=1 unit, AB=2 units, therefore AB=sqrt 61 divided by sqrt5 multipled by 2 (pythagoras theorm)

Then i equate that sqrt61/sqrt5 x 2 to the magnitude of AB(i.e. sqrt((x+2)^2 + (y+1)^2) and equated this equation to equation 1 by elimination.

After which i ended up with a weird answer for x. Pleas etell me where I;ve gone wrong!

Any help is greatly appreciated, thnx loads!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi there,

It looks like you're on the right track with using the Pythagorean theorem to find the length of AB. However, there are a few things that may have gone wrong in your calculations.

Firstly, when you equate the magnitude of AB to the equation you have for AB in terms of x and y, you should not be using the Pythagorean theorem again. Instead, you should be using the fact that AB=2CB, which means that the magnitude of AB is twice the magnitude of CB.

Secondly, when you equate the magnitude of AB to the equation in terms of x and y, you should not be equating it to equation (1). Instead, you should be equating it to the equation for the magnitude of AB, which is sqrt((x+2)^2 + (y+1)^2). This will give you a different equation to work with.

Once you have the correct equation, you can solve for x and then substitute it into the equation for the magnitude of AB to solve for y. This will give you the coordinates of B, and from there you can use the same method to find the coordinates of D.

I hope this helps! Just remember to always check your equations and make sure you are using the correct equations for the given information. Good luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top