Complex Numbers - Finding roots

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the equation z4 = -i using De Moivre's Theorem. The solution involves determining the modulus and argument, leading to the equation 4θ = -π/2 + 2πn. Two conventions for angle normalization are highlighted: one between -π and π, and the other between 0 and 2π. The final arguments derived include -5π/8, -π/2, 3π/2, and 7π/2, with the book's answers reflecting the second convention, resulting in 3π/2, 7π/2, 11π/2, and 15π/2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation
  • Familiarity with De Moivre's Theorem
  • Knowledge of angle normalization conventions in trigonometry
  • Ability to manipulate exponential forms of complex numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of De Moivre's Theorem in solving complex equations
  • Learn about angle normalization conventions in trigonometry
  • Explore the properties of complex roots and their geometric interpretations
  • Investigate the implications of different angle conventions on complex number solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying complex analysis, mathematicians solving polynomial equations, and educators teaching advanced algebra concepts.

ff_yy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the equation z^4= -i


Homework Equations


De Moivre's Theorem


The Attempt at a Solution


I understand how to find the roots by equating modulus and argument but I wanted to ask how do you know which arguments to take? Because I got up to

4*theta = -Pi/2, 3*Pi/2, 7*Pi/2

then I thought that I should take -5*Pi/2 because I thought that the final argument should lie between -Pi and Pi. Is that wrong? Because the answers took 11*Pi/2 instead...

I don't understand. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Short answer: you are right.

Long answer:

First of all, note that for any integer n,
[tex]e^{i \theta} = e^{i (\theta + 2 \pi)}.[/tex]

However, it is convention to normalize angles by subtracting multiples of 2 pi. Unfortunately two different conventions are in use: some people prefer to take all angles between -pi and pi, some prefer to use angles between 0 and 2 pi. If you are using the first [second] convention and you get a negative angle [angle > pi] you can always go to the other convention by adding [subtracting] 2pi.

Now, solving z4 = -i you first write [itex]z = r e^{i \theta}, i = e^{-i \pi}[/itex]. The modulus equation gives r = 1, and then you get
[tex]e^{4 i \theta} = e^{-i \pi / 2}[/tex]
(I am using the convention of angles between -pi and pi here, otherwise you would get 3pi/2 on the RHS).
The solution is given by
[tex]4 \theta = - \pi / 2 + 2 \pi n[/tex]
so -- dividing by 4 --
[tex]\theta = - \frac{\pi}{8} + n \frac{pi}{2}[/tex]

Now all you have to do is plug in values of n to get all the inequivalent angles between -pi and pi. You will find
4theta = -5*Pi/8, -Pi/2, 3*Pi/2, 7*Pi/2

If instead, you use the convention that angles should be between 0 and pi, you have to add 2 pi to the first two (i.e. add 8pi to 4 times the angle), and you get
4theta = 3*Pi/2, 7*Pi/2, 11*Pi/2, 15*Pi/2.

The book is apparently mixing the two conventions. Of course the answers are right, and if you want you could have written down
4theta = +75*Pi/2, -33*Pi/2, 3*Pi/2, -1593*Pi/2
if you wanted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K