Compton Scattering and maximum energy

typeinnocent
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the maximum kinetic energy given to the electrons in a Compton scattering experiment is 10 keV, what is the wavelength of the incident X-Rays?


Homework Equations


\Delta\lambda = (h/mc)*(1-cos\theta)
E = hc/\lambda
\Delta\lambda = \lambdascattered - \lambdaincident

[c]3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b]
I think I made this question more complex than it is...
So I know that \Delta\lambda = .00243 nm and Einitial=Ephoton + Eelectron, and Eelectron =10 keV.
I made \lambdascattered = hc/Ephoton.
This equals \Delta\lambda = hc/(Einitial - 10 keV), and then I plugged hc/\lambdaincident for Einitial.

My final equation is .00243 - \lambdaincident = 1240 eVnm/(hc/\lambdaincident - 10 kEv).

The solution is .0239 nm, however the correct answer in the book is .022 nm.
Although the solution is close, I feel that it's more due to luck than to actually doing the correct methodology. Could anyone help me solve this problem? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so if you're happy with the wavelength shift to find the energy shift knowing

E = \frac{hc}{\lambda}

differentiating and assuming only small changes, which probably isn't too far form the truth..
dE = -\frac{hc}{\lambda^2}d\lambda

if you want the exact answer you need to solve:
\Delta E = \frac{hc}{\lambda} -\frac{hc}{\lambda + \Delta \lambda}
you should be able to solve for lambda, by multiplying through by the denominators & rearranging to give a quadratic in terms of lambda
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top