Computing Electric Field From The Potential

faint545
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Three identical point charges, each with a charge equal to q, lie in the xy plane. Two of the charges are on the y axis at y = -a and y = +a, and the third charge is on the x axis at x = a.

a) Find the potential as a function of position along the x axis.
b) Use the part a) result to obtain an expression for Ex(x), the x component of the electric field as a function of x. Check your answers to parts a) and b) at the origin and as x approaches \infty to see if they yield the expected results.

Hi all. I'm having a very hard time understanding this portion of Physics so please bear with me.

The furthest I got with this problem is deciding to use the sum of the potentials at each point to calculate the potential of the system. Something like...

\frac{kq_{1}}{r_{1}} + \frac{kq_{2}}{r_{2}} + \frac{kq_{3}}{r_{3}}


I think that's the right approach since they are point charges. But now, I'm completely stuck and I don't know what I should do next... Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the values of r1, r2, and r3 at position x along the x-axis ?
 
SammyS said:
What are the values of r1, r2, and r3 at position x along the x-axis ?

Here's what I've done in regards to your question... I hope I am on the right track...

link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/244748/2011-09-23%2018.29.26.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
\sqrt{x^2+a^2}\ne x+a

However, \sqrt{x^2+(-a)^2}=\sqrt{x^2+a^2}\,.

r3 = | x - a | . If x > a then |x - a| = x -a . Otherwise, |x - a| = a - x .

So, V(x) = ?
 
SammyS said:
\sqrt{x^2+a^2}\ne x+a

However, \sqrt{x^2+(-a)^2}=\sqrt{x^2+a^2}\,.

r3 = | x - a | . If x > a then |x - a| = x -a . Otherwise, |x - a| = a - x .

So, V(x) = ?

So I suppose V(x) = kq(\frac{2}{\sqrt{x^{2}+a^{2}}} + \frac{1}{a-x}) if x < a and V(x) = kq(\frac{2}{\sqrt{x^{2}+a^{2}}} + \frac{1}{x-a}) if x > a.

I think I can compute E_{x}(x) from here.. Thanks for all your help!
 
Looks good !
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top