Computing Normalisation Constant A

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the normalization constant for a wavefunction defined as Fi = A exp[b*mod(x)], where b is a positive constant. Participants clarify that "mod(x)" refers to the absolute value of x, prompting the suggestion to split the integral into two parts: one from negative infinity to zero and the other from zero to positive infinity. This approach simplifies the integration process by addressing the different behaviors of the absolute value function in those intervals. The original poster expresses gratitude for the guidance, indicating they now understand how to proceed. The conversation effectively resolves the query regarding the normalization constant calculation.
wam_mi
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Question: Given that Wavefunction Fi = A exp[b*mod(x)], which b is a non zero positive constant. Calculate the normalisation constant.

Homework Equations



1 = Integrating Mod square (Wavefunction) from minus infinity to positive infinity

The Attempt at a Solution



It's the mod(x) there which I don't really know how to deal with it. Could anyone please help me out? Many Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By mod(x) do you mean the absolute value of x- |x|?

If so

HINT: Remember that |x|=-x if x<0 and |x|= x if x>0.

Use this fact and split the integral into the sum of two integrals, one from -\infty to 0 and the other from 0 to \infty.
 
G01 said:
By mod(x) do you mean the absolute value of x- |x|?

If so

HINT: Remember that |x|=-x if x<0 and |x|= x if x>0.

Use this fact and split the integral into the sum of two integrals, one from -\infty to 0 and the other from 0 to \infty.


Thanks a lot, I think I've got it now!

Cheers!
 
No problem! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top