Conceptual Electric field question

AI Thread Summary
Two solid spheres, one a conductor and the other an insulator, both with identical charges, create different electric fields at specified distances. At 6 cm, the electric field from Sphere A (conductor) is greater than that from Sphere B (insulator), leading to the conclusion that Ea > Eb > 0. At 4 cm, the same relationship holds true, as the electric field inside a conductor is uniform and outside behaves as if all charge is concentrated at the center. The discussion emphasizes understanding the nature of electric fields in conductors versus insulators without interaction between the spheres. Confidence in interpreting the question correctly is noted as a concern among participants.
irishbob
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two solid spheres, both of radius 5 cm, carry identical total charges of 2 microcoulombs. Sphere A is a good conductor. Sphere B is an insulator, and its charge is distributed uniformly throughout its volume. How do the magnitudes of the electric fields they separately create at a radial distance of 6 cm compare?
A: Ea>Eb=0
B: Ea>Eb>0
C: Ea=Eb>0
D: Ea=Eb=0
E: 0<Ea<Eb
F: 0=Ea<Eb

How do the magnitudes of the electric fields they separately create at radius 4 cm compare? Chose from the same possibilities.

Homework Equations


E=K\frac{q}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I think it's C for both, but for some reason I'm not confident. I just want to make sure I'm understanding the question. So it's only asking about the electric field at a given point 6 (and 4) cm away without them anywhere near each other, meaning their fields are not interacting at all. Is this right?
This isn't for webassign, so I have no way to confirm.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
irishbob said:
Well I think it's C for both, but for some reason I'm not confident. I just want to make sure I'm understanding the question. So it's only asking about the electric field at a given point 6 (and 4) cm away without them anywhere near each other, meaning their fields are not interacting at all. Is this right?

That's the way I read it.
 
Cool, just wanted to make sure. I understand this stuff pretty well conceptually, but I'm awful at interpreting the questions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top