Conceptual Question-Capacitance

  • Thread starter Thread starter PlatoDescartes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
A 2.50 μF capacitor connected to a 9.30 V power supply retains its capacitance even when the voltage is increased by 3.00 V. The confusion arises from the relationship described by the equation Q=ΔV*C, which indicates that while charge (Q) increases with voltage (V), capacitance (C) remains constant. Capacitance is determined solely by the capacitor's material and geometry, not by voltage or charge. Therefore, increasing the voltage does not affect the capacitance value. The key takeaway is that capacitance is an intrinsic property of the capacitor.
PlatoDescartes
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We start with a 2.50 μF capacitor connected to a power supply set to a voltage of 9.30 V. Then we increase the voltage on the power supply by 3.00 V. Now what is its capacitance?

Homework Equations


Q=ΔV*C

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is 2.5 μF still, but WHY doesn't the capacitance change when the voltage changes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PlatoDescartes said:
The answer is 2.5 μF still, but WHY doesn't the capacitance change when the voltage changes?
Why do you think it should? If you had a 10 ohm resistor across the power supply would you expect it to become 11 ohms if you increased the voltage?
 
phinds said:
Why do you think it should? If you had a 10 ohm resistor across the power supply would you expect it to become 11 ohms if you increased the voltage?
According to the equation Q=VC, if voltage increases, capacitance should too... I'm missing something here... I apologize!
 
PlatoDescartes said:
According to the equation Q=VC, if voltage increases, capacitance should too... I'm missing something here... I apologize!
Capacitance is not dependent on voltage nor charge though, only material/geometry. Which is why it doesn't change.
 
Q is the charge.

If you increase the voltage (V), the charge increases but the capacitance (C) stays constant.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Equivalent capacitance of capacitors
Replies
4
Views
5K
Capacitor Questions Charging and Discharging
Replies
4
Views
3K
Non-Complex Capacitor Potential Difference question
Replies
9
Views
2K
Changing capacitance effect on ripple in full rectification circuit
Replies
4
Views
3K
Charge on a capacitor in a series
Replies
1
Views
2K
Energy stored in Capacitor Network
Replies
2
Views
13K
Capacitor charge in series and parallel circuit
Replies
3
Views
7K
Calculating the Charge on Capacitor
Replies
8
Views
6K
Find the unknown capacity of two capacitors
Replies
5
Views
1K
Change in Capacitor for largest possible Current
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top