Conceptually ok problem, but very difficult to solve

  • Thread starter Thread starter Corneo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a challenging physics problem involving a photon colliding with a free electron, requiring the calculation of the scattered photon's angle, wavelength, and energy. The user expresses difficulty in solving the system of equations derived from conservation of momentum and energy, particularly due to time constraints on a midterm. Suggestions include using the quadratic formula to solve for the new wavelength and employing numerical methods or computer programs for efficiency. Additionally, leveraging trigonometric identities to simplify the momentum equation is recommended for finding the scattered angle. Understanding the underlying concepts is emphasized as crucial for tackling such complex problems.
Corneo
Messages
320
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was given this problem on a midterm regarding a photon colliding with a free electron. I need to find the angle of the scattered photon \theta, the new wavelength \lambda', and its energy.

It states that the electron scatters at an angle of 60 degrees (relative and below the initial photon momentum) and at a velocity of 4 x 10^7 m/s.

I already set up the three equations given but I simply have no idea how to solve this systerm, substitution seems to be suicide due to the limited time on a midterm. I do not think matrices would help either. I just would like to know how to solve for the photon's scattered angle, because that seems like the most difficult part of this problem.

From conservation of momentum I can write.

x: \frac {h}{\lambda} = \gamma m u \cos \phi + \frac {h}{\lambda&#039;} \cos \theta \qquad \phi = 60^\circ, u = 4 \times 10^7 m/s[/itex]<br /> y: 0 = \frac {h}{\lambda&amp;#039;} \sin \theta - \gamma m u \sin \phi<br /> <br /> From conservation of energy I can write.<br /> <br /> \frac {hc}{\lambda} + mc^2 = \frac {hc}{\lambda&amp;#039;} + \gamma m c^2<br /> <br /> From here I simply do not know solve to solve this system. The unknowns are \lambda, \lambda&amp;#039;, \theta
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
, and \gamma. Please help! The best way to solve this system of equations is to use the quadratic formula.First, solve the momentum equation for γm:\gamma m = \frac{\frac{h}{\lambda} - \frac{h}{\lambda&#039;}\cos\theta}{u\cos\phi}Now substitute this expression into the energy equation:\frac{hc}{\lambda} + mc^2 = \frac{hc}{\lambda&#039;} + \left(\frac{\frac{h}{\lambda} - \frac{h}{\lambda&#039;}\cos\theta}{u\cos\phi}\right)c^2This can be rearranged to give a quadratic equation in λ':\lambda&#039;^2 + \left( \frac{hc}{u\cos\phi} - \frac{hc\cos\theta}{u\cos\phi} \right)\lambda&#039; - \frac{hc}{u\cos\phi}\lambda = 0The solution to this equation can be found using the quadratic formula:\lambda&#039; = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}, wherea = 1 \qquad b = \frac{hc}{u\cos\phi} - \frac{hc\cos\theta}{u\cos\phi} \qquad c = \frac{hc}{u\cos\phi}\lambdaOnce you have the values of \lambda' you can then solve for θ using the momentum equation.
 
, \gamma, and \phi.

First of all, I want to commend you for recognizing the difficulty of this problem. It shows that you are thinking critically and not just trying to blindly solve it.

In terms of solving the system of equations, substitution may indeed be a difficult and time-consuming method. One alternative approach could be to use a numerical method, such as Newton's method or the bisection method, to iteratively solve for the unknown variables. This may be more efficient and accurate than trying to solve the system algebraically.

Another option could be to use a computer program or online calculator that can solve systems of equations for you. This would save you time and allow you to focus on understanding the concepts rather than getting bogged down in the calculations.

In terms of finding the scattered angle, you could try using the conservation of momentum equation in the x-direction to solve for \theta. This would involve rearranging the equation and using trigonometric identities to simplify it.

Overall, it is important to remember that some problems may not have a straightforward analytical solution and may require more advanced techniques or the use of technology. The key is to understand the concepts and be able to apply them, rather than getting caught up in the calculations. I hope this helps and good luck on your midterm!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top