Conditions for Lagrangian Conserved Quantity A(q,p)=qp

  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



what condition must satisfy the potential so a Lagrangian m \dot q \dot q - V(q)

has as a conserved quantity A(q,p)=qp


Homework Equations



A(q,p)=qp m \dot q \dot q - V(q)

The Attempt at a Solution



since we have the conserved quantity A(q,p)=qp [/tex] i believe that a condition for the potential is to be scale-invariant v(cq)=V(q)c for any constant 'c'

the other attempt to solution is this, since 'A' is a conserved quantity then the Poisson brackets should vanish so {A,H}=0 using the definition of Poisson bracket i should get an ODe for the potential V(q).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zetafunction said:

Homework Statement



what condition must satisfy the potential so a Lagrangian m \dot q \dot q - V(q)

has as a conserved quantity A(q,p)=qp

Homework Equations



A(q,p)=qp m \dot q \dot q - V(q)

The Attempt at a Solution



since we have the conserved quantity A(q,p)=qp [/tex] i believe that a condition for the potential is to be scale-invariant v(cq)=V(q)c for any constant 'c'

the other attempt to solution is this, since 'A' is a conserved quantity then the Poisson brackets should vanish so {A,H}=0 using the definition of Poisson bracket i should get an ODe for the potential V(q).

Interesting problem, I tried the poisson brackets got a solution check it out if it makes sense to you.

\frac{\partial}{\partial q}A \frac{\partial}{\partial p}H - \frac{\partial}{\partial p}A \frac{\partial}{\partial q}V = 0

p\frac{\partial}{\partial p}H - q \frac{\partial}{\partial q}V = 0

m\dot q\frac{\partial m\dot q^2}{\partial m\dot q} - q \frac{\partial}{\partial q}V = 0

2\left(\frac{\partial q}{\partial t}\right)^2 = q \frac{\partial}{\partial q}V

Now left term is time dependant and the right term is time independant for this DE to hold for all time both of them must be equal to a constant say C

C = q \frac{\partial}{\partial q}V

which leaves us with

V(q) = C\ln(q) + C_{1}

does this make sense to you? I saw no one gave this one a shot so I tried, but I am not entirely sure.
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top