Conduction in reverse biasing too? Is it the case with transistor?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of transistors, specifically focusing on conduction in reverse biasing within a PNP junction configuration. Participants explore the mechanics of current flow in transistors, using analogies and questioning the underlying principles of operation in relation to reverse biasing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a mechanical analogy of a diode using a one-way valve to illustrate the concept of conduction, questioning where the analogy fails in the context of a transistor's collector-base junction.
  • Another participant explains that in a common-emitter circuit, the collector-base junction is reverse biased, which is essential for controlling current flow, and discusses the role of charge carriers from the emitter.
  • It is noted that a high current gain (β) allows most electrons to reach the collector-base junction despite reverse biasing, with a participant emphasizing the thinness of the base as a contributing factor.
  • Some participants express confusion about how electrons can traverse the reverse-biased junction and question the conditions that lead to a large positive collector-base voltage (Vcb).
  • Clarifications are made regarding the behavior of electrons and holes in the base, with one participant mentioning that the base current consists mainly of hole current moving towards the emitter.
  • Discussion includes the impact of frequency on the transistor's performance, specifically how it affects the current gain (β) and the transition frequency (ft).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion regarding the mechanics of current flow in reverse biasing, indicating that multiple competing views and uncertainties remain in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific numerical values related to electron recombination and current flow, but there is no consensus on the implications of these values or the overall behavior of the transistor under reverse bias conditions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying semiconductor physics, electrical engineering, or anyone looking to understand the operational principles of transistors and their behavior under different biasing conditions.

PrakashPhy
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Conduction in reverse biasing too?? Is it the case with transistor??

I have a mechanical analogy of diode in which a socket is provided with a one way valve. (figure 1st below). The arrow inside the circle shows the direction of motor pump. When there is enough pressure to lift the valve (barrier potential) the socket will let water go without any resistance( ideal). this would exactly work out like a diode in a circuit.

Now i connect such two sockets to form a "PNP" jnction. (BJT). In the common base connection the collector-base junction is is reverse biased. My fluid flow analogy says the water should flow through the first valve whereas the second valve should essentially not let fluid flow. But they say " Large current flow through that valve (collector= base)"
attachment.php?attachmentid=48232&stc=1&d=1339409662.png


Where has my analogy gone wrong?? What actually causes the fluid (current) flow at a higher rate through the second valve (Collector-base jucntion)??

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • transistor.png
    transistor.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 691
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
These things used to be all the rage:
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/fluid-transistor-circuits/ ... Modern Mechanics June 1960 :)
BTW: You cannot link to an image on your C: drive unless you run a file server. Better upload it someplace.
 


the collector-base junction is reversed biased in a normal common-emitter circuit and that's the point! that's how current is controlled which (with a large Vc) get's you a current-controlled current source.

for charge-carriers coming from the emitter (electrons in the NPN case), if the transistor \beta is about 99, that means for every 100 electrons that cross the (forward-biased) emitter-base junction, only 1 of those electrons "recombines" with a hole in the base, and since the base is very thin, the other 99 electrons make it all the way to the other side of the base (the collector-base junction) and when they see that juicy, large, and positive Vcb, they just can't resist.

normally, with a junction, reverse-biasing will cause that junction to be devoid of charge carriers on both sides of the junction and thus, it cannot conduct electricity. but the emitter supplies that charge and, if the base is thin (which results in a high current gain \beta) much of that charge supplies what is otherwise missing at the collector-base junction. this is why soldering two diodes, back-to-back, won't work as a transistor.
 


rbj said:
the collector-base junction is reversed biased in a normal common-emitter circuit and that's the point! that's how current is controlled which (with a large Vc) get's you a current-controlled current source.

for charge-carriers coming from the emitter (electrons in the NPN case), if the transistor \beta is about 99, that means for every 100 electrons that cross the (forward-biased) emitter-base junction, only 1 of those electrons "recombines" with a hole in the base, and since the base is very thin, the other 99 electrons make it all the way to the other side of the base (the collector-base junction) and when they see that juicy, large, and positive Vcb, they just can't resist.

normally, with a junction, reverse-biasing will cause that junction to be devoid of charge carriers on both sides of the junction and thus, it cannot conduct electricity. but the emitter supplies that charge and, if the base is thin (which results in a high current gain \beta) much of that charge supplies what is otherwise missing at the collector-base junction. this is why soldering two diodes, back-to-back, won't work as a transistor.

Actually if the beta is 99, the number of electrons emitted from the emitter that recombine in the base is more like 1 in 5,000. Base current is chiefly consisting of hole current from the base towards the emitter. Nearly all base current is this injection component. The transport component is the fraction of emitted electrons that recombine in the base, not surviving the trip to the collector. Just thought this should be mentioned.

Claude
 


rbj said:
that means for every 100 electrons that cross the (forward-biased) emitter-base junction, only 1 of those electrons "recombines" with a hole in the base, and since the base is very thin, the other 99 electrons make it all the way to the other side of the base (the collector-base junction) and when they see that juicy, large, and positive Vcb, they just can't resist.


This is where I have a problem in understanding.. How can 99 electrons make it all the way to the other side? Shouldn't they be resisted by the reverse biased voltage? And how do we get large positive Vcb??
 
PrakashPhy said:
This is where I have a problem in understanding.. How can 99 electrons make it all the way to the other side? Shouldn't they be resisted by the reverse biased voltage? And how do we get large positive Vcb??

Try this link.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/worksheets/bjt0.html

Study questions 6 & 13.
 


PrakashPhy said:
This is where I have a problem in understanding.. How can 99 electrons make it all the way to the other side? Shouldn't they be resisted by the reverse biased voltage? And how do we get large positive Vcb??
Actually, the bias on the b-c junction attracts electrons. Draw it and you'll see for yourself.

Claude
 


cabraham said:
Actually if the beta is 99, the number of electrons emitted from the emitter that recombine in the base is more like 1 in 5,000. Base current is chiefly consisting of hole current from the base towards the emitter. Nearly all base current is this injection component. The transport component is the fraction of emitted electrons that recombine in the base, not surviving the trip to the collector. Just thought this should be mentioned.

thanks, Claude. what i remember from my solid-state physics class 35 years ago is spotty. i forgot that there were both holes and electrons were moving in the base.

so with your numbers, 1 out of 5000 electrons recombine in the base and 4999 present themselves to the c-b junction. and for every electron that recombines there is 49 holes that move to the b-e junction (and get recombined in the emitter)?
 


PrakashPhy said:
This is where I have a problem in understanding.. How can 99 electrons make it all the way to the other side? Shouldn't they be resisted by the reverse biased voltage?

no, they are attracted to the collector by that voltage.

And how do we get large positive Vcb??

by hooking it up to a power supply. like in the run-of-the-mill common emitter circuit.
 
  • #10


rbj said:
thanks, Claude. what i remember from my solid-state physics class 35 years ago is spotty. i forgot that there were both holes and electrons were moving in the base.

so with your numbers, 1 out of 5000 electrons recombine in the base and 4999 present themselves to the c-b junction. and for every electron that recombines there is 49 holes that move to the b-e junction (and get recombined in the emitter)?

You're thinking the right way. In addition, as frequency increases, the displacement current needed to charge/discharge the b-e diffusion capacitance increases. Thus beta drops off at the rate of a factor of 10 per decade of frequency. At the frequency labeled as "ft", the beta value is unity. This is the "transition frequency". BR.

Claude
 
  • #11


cabraham said:
... as frequency increases, the displacement current needed to charge/discharge the b-e diffusion capacitance increases. Thus beta drops off at the rate of a factor of 10 per decade of frequency. At the frequency labeled as "ft", the beta value is unity. This is the "transition frequency".

or the gain-bandwidth product?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K