Confused on whether this counts as an external torque

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding whether the force acting on a mass in a circular motion constitutes an external torque. The formula a = v^2/r is referenced, along with the relationship Mg = mv^2/r, highlighting the challenge of two unknowns, v and r. Participants clarify that the tension from the string is radial, resulting in zero torque about the center of rotation, which is crucial for understanding angular momentum conservation. It is emphasized that conservation of angular momentum holds true only when no external torques are present, and since the radial force does not create torque, it does not interfere with the circular motion. The conclusion is that a tangential force is necessary to generate torque, and the current setup does not provide that.
laser
Messages
104
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
Posted in description
Relevant Equations
Tension in this case is Mg, which is equal to centripetal force, mv^2/r
1701686067504.png

For part (d), there is the formula a = v^2/r I can use. Note that Mg = mv^2/r, we have two unknowns, v and r. I can solve this if conservation of angular momentum is true, i.e. mvr = constant. I am not convinced I can use this however, because is increasing M torque?

My idea is that it is an external torque, because by the right hand rule, torque points along the axis which M is acting on.

How can I solve this problem?

(This problem comes from a past exam paper, which the physics department will not provide help with)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
laser said:
because is increasing M torque?
What torque? The force from the string on the mass m is radial.
 
Damn, you're right. I kind of forgot their configuration. Thanks!
 
Orodruin said:
What torque? The force from the string on the mass m is radial.
One more doubt: The conservation of angular momentum is valid if there are no external torques. Even though this torque is not interfering with the motion of the object rotating in a circle, there is still an external torque being applied to the system (radially). Why can we still say the conservation of angular momentum is constant? Is it only constant in the plane that m rotates in?
 
laser said:
Even though this torque is not interfering with the motion of the object rotating in a circle, there is still an external torque being applied to the system (radially).
There is no torque
.
Consider a force F and some point P (which can be anywhere).

Let d be the perpendicular (shortest) distance between F's line-of-action and P.

The magnitude of the torque (about P) is Fd.

But if P lies on the force's line-of-action, then d=0. In this case, the torque about P is Fd = Fx0 = 0.

In the current question, the tension acting on the mass is radial - it acts through the centre of rotation: so d=0 making the torque (about the centre of rotation) zero.

Consider trying to open a screw-top cap on bottle using a radial force! There is zero torque about the centre of rotation and the cap doesn't turn. You need a tangential force (or component of force) to create a torque.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top