Confusion about Lorentz Transform

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Lorentz Transform in the context of Special Relativity, specifically addressing the relationship between time intervals measured by stationary and moving observers. Participants explore the implications of time dilation and the mathematical formulation of the Lorentz Transform.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why the time interval in the moving frame (delta_t') is never less than that in the stationary frame (delta_t), despite understanding the invariance of the spacetime interval.
  • Another participant suggests that the confusion may stem from not fully grasping the implications of time dilation and the proper time of the stationary observer compared to the moving observer.
  • It is noted that when considering events in the moving frame, the stationary observer's proper time is dilated, leading to a greater coordinate time in the moving frame.
  • Participants discuss the mathematical representation of the Lorentz Transform, including the use of the gamma factor (γ) and the conditions under which time intervals are compared.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of describing events in both frames to understand the relationship between proper time and coordinate time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of understanding regarding the implications of the Lorentz Transform and time dilation. While some clarify aspects of the mathematical formulation, others remain uncertain about the physical interpretation of these concepts. No consensus is reached on the initial confusion presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical formulations and diagrams to illustrate their points, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the interpretation of time intervals in different frames. The discussion does not fully resolve the initial confusion about the relationship between delta_t and delta_t' in the context of the Lorentz Transform.

thrush
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I am new here, thought to join as I am trying to learn Relativity, in this case Special Relativity. I have solved a bunch of problems already but ...

The Lorentz Transform formulation I am dealing with is a 4x4 matrix. I understand the invariance of the spacetime interval and have solved it several times:

delta_s^2 = -(delta_t^2) + delta_x^2 ... delta_y, delta_z are zero.

What I don't get is that for any event in frame S, where delta_X (and delta_Y, delta_Z) = 0, and only delta_T is non-zero, I am the guy standing on the train station watching the train pass. Why then is the time in frame S', delta_t' never less than delta_t? It can't be because the denominator sqrt(1-B^2) can never be greater than 1!

How can the passing train's time interval delta_t' be greater than the 'stationary' observer? I thought a velocity like β=3/5C would make delta_t' in the train's inertial reference frame always delta_t' < delta_t?

Sorry to be such a newbie, but I simply must figure this out!

THANKS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to physics forums.

Are you trying to show this from the mathematics of the Lorentz Transformation, or are you trying to understand it on some more fundamental physical basis?

If you are just trying to do it from the mathematics, then there are two ways to do it.

Method 1:

delta_s^2 = -(delta_t'^2) + delta_x'^2 = -(delta_t^2) + 0

Method 2:

If Δx=0, then
Δt&#039;=γΔt
 
thrush said:
Hi!

I am new here, thought to join as I am trying to learn Relativity, in this case Special Relativity. I have solved a bunch of problems already but ...

The Lorentz Transform formulation I am dealing with is a 4x4 matrix. I understand the invariance of the spacetime interval and have solved it several times:

delta_s^2 = -(delta_t^2) + delta_x^2 ... delta_y, delta_z are zero.
That's good but it has nothing to do with the following. I presume you already know that.

thrush said:
What I don't get is that for any event in frame S, where delta_X (and delta_Y, delta_Z) = 0, and only delta_T is non-zero, I am the guy standing on the train station watching the train pass.
OK, you've just described your worldline, the sequence of events marking off your Proper Time where you are standing stationary at the spatial origin of frame S. (Note that you haven't described any events for the passing train.)
thrush said:
Why then is the time in frame S', delta_t' never less than delta_t?
Presumably you intend for frame S' to be the rest frame of the train and the coordinates of the events that you have described are how your Proper Time is dilated in the train frame, that is, it takes more Coordinate Time to mark of an equivalent amount of your Proper Time.
thrush said:
It can't be because the denominator sqrt(1-B^2) can never be greater than 1!
Correct.
thrush said:
How can the passing train's time interval delta_t' be greater than the 'stationary' observer?
Because you are only stationary in frame S. In frame S' you are moving and your Proper Time is dilated. Remember, I said you didn't describe any events in frame S corresponding to the moving train. Or you could describe events for the stationary train in frame S' and transform them into frame S and then you would see that they would represent Time Dilation of the moving train.
thrush said:
I thought a velocity like β=3/5C would make delta_t' in the train's inertial reference frame always delta_t' < delta_t?
Yes, the events in your rest frame corresponding to your stationary position and marked off by delta_t are dilated when transformed into the train's rest frame and marked off by delta_t'. Let me add in a couple spacetime diagrams to depict what I have said. The first one is for frame S in which you are stationary at the spatial origin. I have only shown the plot going from 4 microseconds prior to the origin and 4 microseconds after:

attachment.php?attachmentid=59255&stc=1&d=1370327473.png

Each blue dot represents one microsecond of time in the rest frame S and has coordinates of an event.

Now we transform all the coordinates of the blue dot events into a frame moving at 3/5c towards the right:

attachment.php?attachmentid=59256&stc=1&d=1370327473.png

Now we see how you are depicted in the train frame: you are moving to the left and your time is dilated or stretched out compared to the Coordinate Time of the train frame.

thrush said:
Sorry to be such a newbie, but I simply must figure this out!
Hopefully you can now.
thrush said:
THANKS
You're welcome.
 

Attachments

  • ObserverWatchingTrainA.PNG
    ObserverWatchingTrainA.PNG
    1.1 KB · Views: 642
  • ObserverWatchingTrainB.PNG
    ObserverWatchingTrainB.PNG
    1.9 KB · Views: 670
Last edited:
Now I want to add into the train's rest frame S' events corresponding to it being at the spatial origin of its frame. I'll show the train in red (you are still blue):

attachment.php?attachmentid=59257&stc=1&d=1370328653.png

I think you can see that the train, at least the engineer's location, in his rest frame looks just like you did in your rest frame.

Now we transform all the events back into the original frame S:

attachment.php?attachmentid=59258&stc=1&d=1370328653.png

And now we see what I think you originally expected to see of the train's time being dilated.
 

Attachments

  • ObserverWatchingTrainC.PNG
    ObserverWatchingTrainC.PNG
    2.1 KB · Views: 645
  • ObserverWatchingTrainD.PNG
    ObserverWatchingTrainD.PNG
    2.1 KB · Views: 649

Similar threads

  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K