Confusion regarding application of Conservation of Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of the conservation of momentum and angular momentum in two collision problems involving a point mass and a rod, and a bullet and a circular loop. The confusion arises from the correct calculation of the moment of inertia and the relationship between linear velocity and angular velocity after the collisions. It is clarified that while the moment of inertia of the bullet can be considered zero, the axis of rotation must be carefully chosen, typically around the center of mass of the system. The correct approach involves conserving angular momentum about a point where external torque is zero, leading to the realization that the relationship between the bullet's velocity and the angular velocity needs proper formulation. Ultimately, understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving the problems presented.
Amartya Sen
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Actually, my confusion originated from solving two different problems...

1) A point object of mass 'm' moving horizontally hits the lower end of the uniform thin rod of length 'l' and mass 'm' and sticks to it. The rod is resting on a horizontal, frictionless surface and pivoted at the other end as shown in figure. Find out just after collision the angular velocity of the system.

2) A circular wooden loop of mass 'm' and radius 'R' rests flat on a horizontal frictionless surface. A bullet, also of mass 'm', and moving with a velocity 'V', strikes the loop tangentially and gets embedded in it. The thickness of the loop is much less than 'R'. The angular velocity with which the system rotates after the bullet strikes the loop is ...

Homework Equations


[/B]
mrCMvCM +ICM ω2 = constant

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I solved both questions using the above formula exactly in the same way, but was able to solve only (1)...
What I am confused with is that whether to add the external particle moment of inertia in "ICMω2"

I applied the formula independently for both objects, that means the particle's MoI about its own CM is 0.

I get the answer in (2) if I add Consider the MoI of the ring to be 2mR2 instead of simply mR2...

If I follow this approach in (1), then I get another answer which is not correct...

What to do??
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Amartya,

I hesitate to comment (see reason below), but I do notice two things:

Amartya Sen said:
the particle's MoI about its own CM is 0
That is correct and a good assumption: the size of the bullet isn't given and it can be thought of as a point mass. However, the axis of the rotational movement is executes after the collision is probably not through the COM of the bullet !
Amartya Sen said:
I get the answer in (2) if I add Consider the MoI of the ring to be 2mR2 instead of simply mR2...
That may well be, but the ring has a moment of inertia for rotations about its axis through the center of mass (perpendicular to the plane) that really is no more than mR2.

Now my hesitation: After the collision you have an expression for the momentum of the center of mass. It's not in your list of relevant equations, but I do think you need it. The motion is split in two: the linear motion of the center of mass plus a rotation around it. So the axis of rotation is supposed to be the center of mass and you will need the moment of inertia of ring+bullet around this axis.

From the book answer it would almost seem the rotation could be around the center of the ring, which I think is not correct. @Doc Al ?
 
Amartya Sen said:
I get the answer in (2) if I add Consider the MoI of the ring to be 2mR2 instead of simply mR2...
I get v/(3r), which I assume is correct, without such a cheat.
I took moments about the point of impact, as a point fixed in space.
Please post your working.
 
Thanks haru ! Smart approach!
 
Yes.! That's right! The correct answer is V/3R

Pardon, but I didn't understand your solution. You conserved angular momentum about point of contact ?

OK..., let me clear my basics first of all..,
  • I suppose no matter about what point we are conserving angular momentum, we always use velocity of COM and MoI of COM of the object. (P.S.--if there are more that one objects, I write different mvr + Iω terms for the different COM of different objects in the system)
  • I always conserve angular momentum about a point where external torque is 0.
Hence observing the points above, in question (2), I conserved momentum about centre of the ring.
That becomes :

mvr=mv1r+mr2ω : v1 is the velocity of bullet after it has embedded in the loop and ω is the common angular speed.

..OK, now I think I figured out my mistake..

I think I incorrectly built a relationship b/w v1 and ω as v1=ωr, which I now think is not correct.

But now I can't figure out the relationship b/w the above two variables.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top