Understanding F=ma: How to Prove It with Conical Pendulum Equations"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on verifying F=ma using conical pendulum equations, with confusion arising over the specific proof requirements. The instructor emphasized the importance of relating mass, string length, radius, and period, suggesting that understanding these relationships is crucial. Key equations involving tension, mass, and radius are presented, but the participant struggles to incorporate the string length into their calculations. They seek clarification on how to effectively use trigonometric relationships to connect these variables. Overall, the focus remains on applying circular motion equations and trigonometry to solidify the proof of F=ma.
wanu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
It's not a problem, it's a proof. The trouble being that I'm not entirely sure what I'm supposed to be proving, which is why I'm getting so confused. Our instructor told us to verify F=ma using the equations that we got from a conical pendulum lab. When further prompted, he said to divide them (which I took to mean finding the tangent) There was also mention of showing the relationship between m (mass), l (length of the string the mass was on), R (the radius of the circle), and P (the period. (In retrospect, that seems to be the most important instruction.)



Although I keep confusing myself, this is what I think I know:
where T refers to the Tension force
T_x =Tsin(theta T) =mv^2/R
T_y= Tcos(theta T)=mg
and from those I got tan(theta)=v^2/Rg=4pi^2R/Pg



And that's where I get stuck, because I'm not entirely sure how to include l in the relationship, and if I do it should have to do with h (the height of the theoretical triangle), right? So if that's true, how do I take that into account and what should I be doing with the tan(theta)?

Any help or guidance would be greatly appreciated-- I really just want to be able to wrap my head around this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have a look at the circular motion equations you can probably substitute in for acceleration to get all the quantities you want. Just remember your trigonometry as that is where you will get the length of the string into the equation.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top