Conservation of Angular Momentum and Energy

AI Thread Summary
To find the radial distance and velocity of a comet at aphelion given its perihelion values, conservation of angular momentum and energy principles are applied. The relationship L = m*v1*r1 = m*v2*r2 indicates that angular momentum is conserved, but it leads to a dependency between r2 and v2. The user expresses confusion over the applicability of gravitational potential energy equations due to a skipped chapter in their course. Despite attempts to solve the equations using Mathematica, the user encounters complex results. Clarification on the use of Mathematica is also sought in the discussion.
Woodgoat
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We measure a comet at perihelion to have a radial distance r1 and a velocity v1. Find the radial distance and velocity when it reaches aphelion.

Homework Equations


L=mvr=I*\omega
E=.5mv^2+U

The Attempt at a Solution


My professor skipped the chapter on Newton's Gravitation, F=GMm/r^2, so I don't think it applies here.

The book is entirely symbolic--the answer expected should be in terms of v1 and r1.

I labeled the radial distance and velocity r2 and v2, respectively. Since L is constant, m*v1*r1 = m*v2*r2, or v1*r1=v2*r2. Of course, this equation only gives the unknown radial distance in terms of the unknown velocity, or vice versa.

I don't think U = -GMm/r would apply here, since, again, my professor skipped the chapter on gravitation. I tried solving using a second equality, .5m*v1^2-GMm/r1=.5m*v2^2-GMm/r2, but when I solved the system of equations with Mathematica, I got a gigantic mess for an answer.

I appreciate your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think both your equations correct, you just did something wrong with the calculations. :smile:

BTW, what's mathematica ? Are you using a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematica" to solve these equations ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top