Conservation of Angular Momentum help

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on the conservation of angular momentum, participants analyze a scenario involving two identical pucks colliding and sticking together. When the mass of each puck is doubled, the total angular momentum also doubles, but the moment of inertia doubles as well, leading to the conclusion that the angular speed (ω) remains unchanged. The key equations discussed include angular momentum (L = m(r^2)ω) and the relationship between angular momentum and moment of inertia (L = Iω). Clarifications emphasize that while mass affects angular momentum, it does not alter the angular speed if velocities remain constant. Ultimately, the consensus is that doubling the mass results in unchanged angular speed due to the proportional increase in both angular momentum and moment of inertia.
wootman23
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For an assignment, I was shown a video where two identical pucks were launched at each other. They were not spinning when launched. They had Velcro on their edges so they stuck to each other when they collided. They hit off-center from each other. Due to conservation of angular momentum, when they collided, they stayed in place at the point of collision and just rotated.

Then I was asked, if the mass of each puck was doubled, what would happen to the angular speed, ω.


Homework Equations


----eqn1--------- m(r^2)ω
----eqn2--------- m(r^2)ω + m(r^2)ω = (m(r^2) + m(r^2))ω



The Attempt at a Solution


First, I tried using the simple equation for angular momentum:
m(r^2)ω
If the mass is doubled, then angular speed is halved.

But then I saw another equation for conservation of momentum:
m(r^2)ω + m(r^2)ω = (m(r^2) + m(r^2))ω

With this equation, when mass is doubled, angular speed stays the same.
Which one do I use? Or am I even going about this correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haha ignore your second equation. If you factor in omega on the right side you will see that it doesn't really tell you anything.

Angular momentum = m r^2 ω
However, we must remember that there are TWO pucks spinning. Since each puck has a mass of m, the total mass is 2m.
Total angular momentum: L = 2mr^2ω
It is common to call angular momentum L.
This is the total angular momentum of two pucks spinning.
If you double the mass then angular momentum would be:
2(2m)r^2ω_2 where ω2 is the new angular speed. We replaced m with 2m and since we did that, the angular speed is unkown, so we represent it with ω2 and solve.
L=2mr^2\omega=2(2m)r^2\omega_2
\omega=2\omega_2
\omega_2=\frac{1}{2}\omega

So, when you double the mass, the angular speed ω gets halved.
 
wootman23 said:
First, I tried using the simple equation for angular momentum:
m(r^2)ω
If the mass is doubled, then angular speed is halved.
But you (and Hertz) are assuming angular momentum is the same initially. Why should that be? Are you reading it as the masses magically being doubled while they're spinning? I doubt that's what's intended.
But then I saw another equation for conservation of momentum:
m(r^2)ω + m(r^2)ω = (m(r^2) + m(r^2))ω
I don't understand how you would be applying that here.
There is a very quick way of answering a question like this: you notice that mass, as a dimension, can be 'factored out'. There are no dimensional magic constants involved (like G, say), and mass does not feature in the dimension of the quantity of interest. It follows that you can scale all the masses involved without affecting the answer.
But let's also analyse it from first principles. First, you have to pick a reference point for the angular momentum. The common mass centre would be a good choice. Since it's an oblique collision, the lines of travel of the two pucks do not pass through the reference point. This means that each has an angular momentum about the reference point before collision. If they approach at speed v and (if they could pass through each other) would each miss the common mass centre by distance d, what is the total angular momentum about the common mass centre before collision?
 
Thanks for the reply Hertz.

Maybe I described the scenario/question wrong, because your answer was incorrect. =(
They spin at the same rate.

Here is their explanation:

By doubling the mass but keeping the velocities unchanged, we doubled the angular momentum of the two-puck system. However, we also doubled the moment of inertia. Since L=I ω, the rotation rate of the two-puck system must remain unchanged.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top