Conservation of angular momentum

In summary, the conversation discusses a question from a university physics exam about a small ball being spun on a rope and the conservation of angular momentum. The conversation concludes that the angular momentum is conserved and the speed of the ball does change when the length of the rope is reduced. There is also a brief discussion about the validity of a posted equation.
  • #1
Jokerhelper
182
0

Homework Statement


Hello everybody! A week ago I wrote my (first) university physics exam, which as most entry-level physics courses was a general introduction to mechanical physics. I had a bit of trouble and doubts with a question, which I will paraphrase to the best of my abilities:

A small ball is attached to a rope. A young kid picks up the rope with his hand and uses it to spin the ball at a constant speed over his head. Both the ball and rope rotate on the same horizontal plane. In addition, both gravity and air friction can be ignored, and we were told to consider the ball's motion as being equivalent to the motion of a particle orbiting a centre point.
With this scenario, the boy then decides to reduce the length of the rope used to spin the object by a half.

a) Is the ball's angular momentum conserved?
b) Does the speed of the ball change?

Homework Equations


There are no specific equations for this question, but I tried to look at relationships between angular momentum, radius and speed:

[tex]\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \vec{\tau}_{net} = \vec{r} \times \vec{F}_{net}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{L} = I \cdot \vec{\omega} = mr^2\vec{\omega}[/tex]

[tex]v = {\omega}r[/tex]

[itex]r_1 = 2r_2[/itex], where [itex]r_{1}[/itex] and [itex]r_{2}[/itex] represent the length of the radius before and after, respectively.

The Attempt at a Solution


In order for angular momentum to be conserved, the net torque must be equal to zero. Initially, this is definitely true since the ball's speed is constant, which implies that there is no tangential acceleration. Therefore, the cross product between [tex]\vec{r}[/tex] and [tex]\vec{F}_{net}[/tex] has to be zero. No matter the length of the radius, angular momentum will be conserved as long as there is no change in tangential acceleration.
Because of this, my answer to part A of the question was "Yes, angular momentum is conserved."

Now, to part B. If my rationale from part A is correct, then:

[tex]\vec{L} = m{r_1}^2\vec{\omega}_1 = m{r_2}^2\vec{\omega}_2[/tex]

[tex]m({2r_2})^2\vec{\omega}_1 = m{r_2}^2\vec{\omega}_2[/tex]

[tex]\vec{\omega}_1 = \frac{\vec{\omega}_2}{4} \rightarrow \omega_1 = \frac{\omega_2}{4}[/tex]

And if this is true,

[tex]
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
v_1 = \omega_1r_1 = \frac{\omega_2}{4} \cdot 2r_2 = \frac{1}{2}(\omega_2r_2) = \frac{1}{2}v_2 \\ v_1 > 0
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
[/tex]

Therefore, the speed did change.



I was wondering if my answers were right, and more importantly if my reasoning was correct. Corrections or suggestions for different ways to approach this question are also appreciated.
Thanks for your attention, and Happy Holidays to all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yup, both parts are correct. Good job, and happy holidays!
 
  • #3
Alright. Thanks and cheers again.
 
  • #4
On a slightly unrelated note, you posted:

[tex]\vec \tau_{net}= \vec r \times \vec F_{net}[/tex]

That strikes me as a bit fishy, which radius vector would you be referring to? Is there a way to prove that [tex]\Sigma \vec r_i \times \vec F_i=\vec r_{resultant} \times \vec F_{net}[/tex] ?
 

Related to Conservation of angular momentum

What is conservation of angular momentum?

Conservation of angular momentum is a physical law that states that the total angular momentum of a system remains constant as long as there are no external torques acting on the system.

How is angular momentum defined?

Angular momentum is defined as the product of an object's moment of inertia and its angular velocity. It is a measure of how much an object is rotating and in what direction.

Why is conservation of angular momentum important?

Conservation of angular momentum is important because it allows us to predict the behavior of rotating systems, such as planets, stars, and galaxies. It also plays a crucial role in understanding phenomena such as spinning tops, gyroscopes, and figure skaters.

What are some real-life examples of conservation of angular momentum?

One example is the Earth's rotation around its axis. Another is the rotation of planets around the sun. The conservation of angular momentum also explains why a spinning top stays upright and why a figure skater spins faster when they pull their arms in.

How does conservation of angular momentum relate to the law of inertia?

The conservation of angular momentum is closely related to the law of inertia, which states that an object will remain in motion or at rest unless acted upon by an external force. In the case of angular momentum, the rotating object will continue to spin at a constant rate unless acted upon by an external torque.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
267
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
286
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
464
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
782
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
245
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
969
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
337
Back
Top