Conservation of Energy with Spring Mass System on Inclined Plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a spring-mass system on an inclined plane, analyzing the energy transformations as the spring is compressed to different extents. It is established that compressing the spring to a distance of 2x results in the box having twice the elastic potential energy compared to compression x, confirming choice B as correct. However, the user struggles to validate the implications of this increased compression on the box's kinetic energy and height achieved on the incline, particularly choices C and D. The calculations suggest that the box will indeed travel higher up the incline when the spring is compressed more, leading to the conclusion that choice C is also correct. Ultimately, the user is encouraged to reconsider the relationships between potential energy, kinetic energy, and the effects of increased spring compression on the system's dynamics.
JakeHowarth
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(Figure attached to post)

A box of mass m is pressed against (but is not attached to) an ideal spring of force constant k, compressing the spring a distance x. After it is released, the box slides up a frictionless incline as shown in Fig. 7.5 and eventually stops. If we repeat this experiment but instead compress the spring a distance of 2x:

A)Just as it moves free of the spring, the box will have twice as much kinetic energy as before.
B)Just before it is released, the box has twice as much elastic potential energy as before.
C)The box will go up the incline twice as high as before.
D)Just as it moves free of the spring, the box will be traveling twice as fast as before.
E)Just as it moves free of the spring, the box will be traveling four times as fast as before.

The weight and the normal force from the surface are balanced, so the only force acting on the box is the work done in compressing the spring = kx.

Homework Equations


(Eq1) Hooke's Law: F = -kx
(Eq2) Conservation of Energy (no external work): Uo + Ko = U + K
(Eq3) Potential Energy of a Spring: (1/2)kx²
(Eq4) Kinetic Energy: (1/2)mv²
(Eq5) Potential Energy of Gravity: mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



I've been able to prove choice B correct by doing the following:

Under compression length x:

(Eq1) F = kx
(Eq3) Us = (1/2)(F)x = (1/2)(kx)(x) = (1/2)kx²

Under compression length 2x:

(Eq1) F = 2kx
(Eq3) Us = (1/2)(F)x = (1/2)(2kx)(x) = kx²

thus, (1/2)kx² * 2 = kx², meaning the potential energy of the mass under compression length 2x is twice as large as the potential energy of the mass under compression length x. Proving choice B correct.

However, I'm having trouble proving the other one's incorrect, especially choice C and choice D because I'm looking at the problem as two parts:

  1. Potential energy of the mass compressed on the spring TO kinetic energy just before release by spring
  2. Initial kinetic energy of just released mass TO final potential energy of mass up ramp

So,

Under compression length x:

(Eq2) Uo = K (no initial kinetic because mass is compressed on spring with no movement, no final potential because this is only up to mass release by spring)
(Eq3, Eq4) (1/2)kx² = (1/2)mv²
v² = kx²/m

Now we switch to part 2, where the mass has been just released from the spring (initial kinetic, no potential) to final position on ramp (final potential, no kinetic)

(Eq2) Ko = U
(Eq3, Eq5) (1/2)m(kx²/m) = mgh
(1/2)kx²/mg = h

Under compression length 2x:

(Eq2) Uo = K (no initial kinetic because mass is compressed on spring with no movement, no final potential because this is only up to mass release by spring)
(Eq3, Eq4) kx² = (1/2)mv²
v² = 2kx²/m

Now we switch to part 2, where the mass has been just released from the spring (initial kinetic, no potential) to final position on ramp (final potential, no kinetic)

(Eq2) Ko = U
(Eq3, Eq5) (1/2)m(2kx²/m) = mgh
kx²/mg = h

Here is the problem: With the height ho = (1/2)kx²/mg under compression length x and h = kx²/mg under compression length 2x, this implies 2ho = h, which proves choice C.

So, I don't know if choice B or choice C is right. If someone can help me clarify this, I would greatly appreciate it. I've been at this for hours.
 

Attachments

  • fig7.5.JPG
    fig7.5.JPG
    5.9 KB · Views: 1,252
Physics news on Phys.org
as you say, PE depends on the square of the compression (½kx^2)
what happens when you square of the new compression , "2x" ?
is the Work done, and the PE stored, 2x as big as before?
(not only is the max Force 2x as strong, but the distance is also 2x as far)
 
Okay, I'll recheck some things.
 
Last edited:
Yes, B is incorrect. The hint was that it is the SPRING which has elastic PE, not the box.
So it must be that the box goes higher, or leaves the spring faster ... (c,d,e)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top