Constant Acceleration of jogging Problem

AI Thread Summary
Al and Bert are jogging at 0.75 m/s when Al decides to accelerate towards a 35 m finish line at a constant rate of 50 m/s². The equation used to determine the time taken by Al to reach the end of the trail is Δx = (1/2)at² + Vt + X. The user struggles with the calculation and realizes a mistake in the acceleration value, questioning its realism. The discussion highlights the need to rearrange the equation into a standard quadratic form to apply the quadratic formula for solving the problem. Understanding the correct application of the quadratic formula is essential for finding the solution.
JRangel42
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Al and Bert are jogging side by side on a trail in the woods at a speed of 0.75 m/s. Suddenly, Al sees the end of the trail 35 m ahead and decides to speed up to reach it. He accelerates at constant rate of 50 m/(s^2) while Bert continues on at a constant speed. (a) How long does it take Al to reach the end of the hill?


Part (a) is the one I'm having trouble understanding.

Homework Equations



Δx = (1/2)at^2 + Vt + X

The Attempt at a Solution



35 = (1/2)(0.50)t^2 + (0.75)t
35 = (0.25)t^2 + (0.75)t
35 = t[(0.25)t + 0.75]
35/t = (0.25)t + 0.75

And, that is where I stopped. I'm sure I pretty much went wrong at the third step.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JRangel42 said:

Homework Statement



Al and Bert are jogging side by side on a trail in the woods at a speed of 0.75 m/s. Suddenly, Al sees the end of the trail 35 m ahead and decides to speed up to reach it. He accelerates at constant rate of 50 m/(s^2) while Bert continues on at a constant speed. (a) How long does it take Al to reach the end of the hill?


Part (a) is the one I'm having trouble understanding.

Homework Equations



Δx = (1/2)at^2 + Vt + X

The Attempt at a Solution



35 = (1/2)(0.50)t^2 + (0.75)t
35 = (0.25)t^2 + (0.75)t
35 = t[(0.25)t + 0.75]
35/t = (0.25)t + 0.75

And, that is where I stopped. I'm sure I pretty much went wrong at the third step.

Your summation is correct.

To solve a quadratic equation, you re-arrange to make the rhs zero, then solve by either factorisation [if you are lucky] or use the quadratic formula.
 
Are you sure of the question wording?...you have an acceleration of 50m/s^2
Which is not realistic.
In your calculation you have 0.5 which is more realistic
 
Holy crap, I forgot about the quadratic formula. Thanks for the help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top