Contact strength in ANSYS Workbench

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling contact between bricks and mortar in ANSYS Workbench, specifically addressing the failure due to loss of adhesion. The user plans to implement "Bonded contact" and "Contact Debonding" with "Cohesive zone material" properties, using experimentally determined maximum normal and shear stresses. They set the "Contact Gap" and "Tangential Slip" to 0.001 mm to maintain nondeformable contact. However, they encountered issues with the contact not debonding under applied shear force during testing. The conversation includes inquiries about the user's progress and shared challenges in simulating similar contact behavior.
Jiri Fila
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I want to model in Ansys Workbench contact between bricks and mortar. From experiments I know maximum normal stress and maximum shear stress. Respectively I know forces in which the contact fails. The failure is brittle due to lost of adhesion.
I tried to use "Bonded contact" and "Contact Debonding" with "Cohesive zone material" properties (see pic. bellow). For "Maximum Normal Contact Stress" I will use maximum normal stress calcutated from maximum force measured during experiments. For "Maximum Equivalent Tangential Contact Stress" I will use maximum shear stress calcutated from maximum force measured during experiments. "Contact Gap" and "Tangential Slip" I choose as 0,001 mm because I want contact nondeformable.
Can anyone tell me, if my idea is correct? When I tried to test it, contact in Mode II (with applied shear force) did not debonded at supposed applied force.
Thank you in advance for any help.
 

Attachments

  • CZM.png
    CZM.png
    19.7 KB · Views: 1,010
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Jiri Fila, I would like to ask did you solve the problem or still working on it? I am also trying to simulate some similar contact behavior in ansys workbench.
 
Unfortunately, not yet.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Back
Top