Continuous Surface Charge Source - Integral Confusion

technicolour1
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
Find the total charge on a circular disc of radius ρ = a if the charge density is given by
ρs = ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin2 φ C/m2 where ρs0 is a constant.
Are the two limits of integration from 0 -> a for ρ and 0->2∏ for φ? In the example given in the notes, ρ varies, instead of being a constant value. Does this mean that I cannot integrate ρ in this problem?


2. Homework Equations

Q = ∫ρdS

3. The Attempt at a Solution

Q = ∫∫ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin^2 (φ) dφdρ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
technicolour1 said:
1. Homework Statement
Find the total charge on a circular disc of radius ρ = a if the charge density is given by
ρs = ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin2 φ C/m2 where ρs0 is a constant.
Are the two limits of integration from 0 -> a for ρ and 0->2∏ for φ? In the example given in the notes, ρ varies, instead of being a constant value. Does this mean that I cannot integrate ρ in this problem?

2. Homework Equations

Q = ∫ρdS   (This is the surface density ρ.)

3. The Attempt at a Solution

Q = ∫∫ρs0 (e^−ρ) sin^2 (φ) dφdρ...
You have the Greek letter rho, ρ, used in two very different ways here.

ρ as a coordinate: This is the role usually player by the letter, r, in polar coordinates.

ρ as (surface) charge density: Here ρ seems to be accompanied by what looks like should be a subscript. ρs and ρs0.

Yes, the limits of integration are as you indicate.

The charge density, ρs, is a function of the coordinate, ρ. (somewhat confusing).

For polar coordinates, the element (differential) for area, dS, is given by: \displaystyle dS=\rho\,d\varphi\,d\rho\,.

Other than that, you seem to be on the right track.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top