Could Earth's Early Magnetic Field Have Trapped Hydrogen in the Atmosphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether Earth's early magnetic field could have been strong enough to trap hydrogen in the atmosphere. It examines how charged hydrogen ions, or protons, could be deflected by the magnetic field and potentially collide with atmospheric ions, leading to their capture. The conversation also touches on the implications of such conditions for the early atmosphere's reducing properties, which are thought to be necessary for abiogenesis. However, it is noted that early mantle convection may have provided the necessary redox differences for life, rather than a hydrogen-rich atmosphere. Ultimately, the upper limit of hydrogen excess is suggested to have been constrained to about 0.5 billion years due to hydrodynamic escape processes.
daniel dahl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
could Earth's early magnetic field have been strong enough to trap hydrogen within the atmosphere?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
How would a magnetic field trap neutral hydrogen atoms?
 
if they were hydrogen ions emitted as solar wind
 
Hydrogen ions, let's just call them protons, have a charge and a mass. When they encounter a magnetic field they will be deflected onto a different trajectory by a Lorentz_force. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force
As a proton spirals down the converging magnetic field lines toward a magnetic pole, it may collide with ions in the upper atmosphere and so could be slowed and trapped.There is significant coupling between the solar wind and the Earth's magnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes Elite Jacob
Interesting question, Daniel. Are you wondering if this could have given the early atmosphere reducing properties, a condition often thought necessary for abiogenesis?
 
Ophiolite said:
Interesting question, Daniel. Are you wondering if this could have given the early atmosphere reducing properties, a condition often thought necessary for abiogenesis?

Not any longer, since early mantle convection is now known to give local environments with the necessary redox differences. (Often around hydrothermal vents as they pass the differentiated and serpentinized minerals.) Instead a near neutral atmosphere would be conducive for life emergence, since the CO2 generates a slightly acidic ocean that contrasts to the mantle convection alkaline conditions and makes (local) organic production effective. Such conditions may seem constraining (less global organic production), but in fact increase the likelihood for life elsewhere since especially ice moons with oceans but also early cold, wet bodies like Mars have them.

Perhaps there were a slightly reducing excess due to hydrogen escape from the hot planet (and perhaps remaining and, yes, captured hydrogen). But too much of an excess and the upper atmosphere goes into hydrodynamic escape, hydrogen vents preferably. (But can remove some somewhat more massive molecules with the outflow.) I think the upper limit of hydrogen excess has been limited to 0.5 billion years from such considerations.
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Back
Top