Could Someone Check This Answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kitz
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of a thin hoop that oscillates as a physical pendulum. The original poster correctly identifies the period formula and moment of inertia for the hoop but struggles with the calculations, arriving at an incorrect radius. It is clarified that the moment of inertia must be adjusted using the parallel-axis theorem, resulting in a total moment of inertia of 2MR². This adjustment is necessary since the hoop is pivoted at the rim rather than its center. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the parallel-axis theorem to solve the problem accurately.
kitz
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I did this problem and have gotten it wrong-- but my math is right. Maybe I'm missing something? Here's the question:

We want to support a thin hoop by a horizontal nail and have the hoop make one complete small-angle oscillation each 2.0 s. What must the hoop's radius be?


So this is a physical pendulum, and in order to find the radius, I need to know the period. The period is found by:

T=2\pi\sqrt{\displaystyle{\frac{I}{mgd}}}
Where I is the moment of inertia, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and d is the distance from the pivot point to the center of gravity.

For a hoop, the moment of inertia is: I=MR^2
And the center of gravity is in the center of the hoop, so d is the radius.

So with that information, I set up the following:

T=2\pi\sqrt{\displaystyle{\frac{MR^2}{MgR}}}
T=2\pi\sqrt{\displaystyle{\frac{R}{g}}}

And in plugging in the values, I get:

2=2\pi\sqrt{\displaystyle{\frac{R}{9.8}}}
Solving for R, I get .9929475

Which, when I plug into my equation, I get very close to 2 for my period. However, this is incorrect...

Any ideas as to why?


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That makes sense. How would I go about finding the moment of inertia about the nail?

...This is a longshot, but would the moment of inertia be 2MR^2??
(using the parallel-axis theorem...)
 
...There was a reply here a minute ago... ...That suddenly disappeared...
 
Sorry, that was me. I wasn't sure about my answer because I haven't done this stuff in a while, but you can try it if you want. And yes, that is the correct moment of inertia around the nail.
 
Yes, you're right, you have to adjust the MI by adding the appropriate amount because you're spinning the hoop around a spot on the rim instead of its center.

If I recall, the formula for adjusting the MI is to take the formula you look up, and add to it md^2, where "m" is the mass of the object, and "d" is the distance away from the center of mass. So you get MR^2+MR^2 = 2MR^2, like you suspected.

Carl
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top