Could the Twin Paradox Really Have Four Solutions That Sum to Zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the possibility of four solutions to the Twin Paradox, suggesting that time dilation could yield both positive and negative values for t' as velocities approach the speed of light. It argues that while gamma must remain positive due to the impossibility of exceeding light speed, the equation t' = t/(1-(v/c)^1/2) could theoretically allow for negative values. However, negative energy, while proposed, has not been observed, leading to the conclusion that gamma cannot be negative. The conversation also emphasizes that at the speed of light (v=c), the equation becomes undefined, indicating a unique solution. Overall, the discussion raises intriguing questions about the implications of relativistic physics on time and energy.
billbray
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
how about this: silly idea, but think about it:

the square root of 1 = {+1,-1}

and we all know: t'=t/(1-(v/c)^1/2)

in essance, t' must simultaneously have values of {+t',-t'} for all velocities not equal to zero and approaching c.

this means that for a relativistic frame of reference, (i.e., twin paradox) there are not 2, but four (4) solutions. and, the sum of all 4 solutions = zero.

does anyone have a good idea why the denominator in t'=t/(1-(v/c)^1/2) can only have a positive value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


billbray said:
how about this: silly idea, but think about it:

the square root of 1 = {+1,-1}

and we all know: t'=t/(1-(v/c)^1/2)

in essance, t' must simultaneously have values of {+t',-t'} for all velocities not equal to zero and approaching c.

this means that for a relativistic frame of reference, (i.e., twin paradox) there are not 2, but four (4) solutions. and, the sum of all 4 solutions = zero.

does anyone have a good idea why the denominator in t'=t/(1-(v/c)^1/2) can only have a positive value?

Gamma is always positive because no object can excel to the speed of light, or beyond. Also there's a square root in there, and the second solution (the negative) would imply negative energy, which we have not observed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


sorry, gamma MUST be always both positive and negative at ANY velocity other than c.

however, zero in the denominator has neither positive or negative values. In fact, it is only at v = c that there is 1 unique solution.
 


p.s. negative energy has been observed - it in fact, is proposed to make up greater than 70% of the energy in the known universe...
 
Negative energy is not the same as dark energy.
 
When we have the equation (x^2)-1=0, and we solve for x, we find that x has two solutions, 1 and -1. Either value will work. It is not both 1 and -1 at the same time. In this sense, what we say is that the value of gamma could be either negative or positive, however a negative value implies an object having negative energy. This has not been observed.
 


billbray said:
sorry, gamma MUST be always both positive and negative at ANY velocity other than c.

however, zero in the denominator has neither positive or negative values. In fact, it is only at v = c that there is 1 unique solution.

At v=c there is no solution. Undefined is not a solution.
 
Back
Top