1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Coulomb's law and spherical charge distribution

  1. Nov 7, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Find the E produced by a spherical charge distribution with uniform charge density at a point inside the sphere, using triple integration.


    2. Relevant equations
    E = 1/4πε ∫f(x,y,z)/r^2 dV


    3. The attempt at a solution
    f(x,y,z) = p
    Radius of sphere = R
    Position of point = d = (a,b,c)

    E = p/4πε ∫∫∫1/r^2 dxdydz

    I tried several things. Among them:

    I change to spherical coordinates.
    0≤θ≤pi
    0≤φ≤2pi
    r ≤ R

    E = 1/4πε ∫∫∫p/r^2 *r^2sinθdrdθdφ = p/4πε ∫∫∫sinθdrdθdφ = pR/ε

    I tried setting (r-d)^2≤R^2, but didn't get anywhere.

    Anyhow... The answer I get is not pr/3ε (I dont even know if the r in this answer is supposed to be the radius of the sphere or the distance from origin to what I called d)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 7, 2013 #2
    You don't have to position the point at (a, b, c). This just makes things more complicated than it needs to be. Assume that the point is on the x-axis, at distance a from the origin (why can you do this?).
     
  4. Nov 8, 2013 #3
    Because I am dealing with the symmetries of a sphere (and can just turn the sphere around if the point is somewhere else), but I still do not know how to get the right integral.
     
  5. Nov 8, 2013 #4
    Take a small element at ##(r, \theta, \phi)## in the sphere. What is the electric field due to it at ##(a, \pi/2, 0)##?

    Note the field is vectorial. Due to the symmetries, you can probably figure out the direction of the field without computing it explicitly, so you only have to consider the components of the field in that direction.
     
  6. Nov 8, 2013 #5
    The force is pointing in the radial direction.

    E = k * dV/r12
    r1 is the distance from dV to a

    I tried rewriting r1 in terms of r and a using the law of cosines and got:

    r12 = a2 + r2 - 2arcos(π/2 + θ)cos(ϕ)

    E*dV = k *dV / (a2 + r2 - 2arcos(π/2 + θ)cos(ϕ)) =

    This cannot possibly be the integral they are expecting me to solve (but, then again, I am horrible with spherical coordinates, so maybe there is something I am forgetting).
     
  7. Nov 9, 2013 #6
    I do not think your expression for the square of the distance is correct. In Cartesian coordinates, the square of the distance between ##(x, y, z)## and ##(X, Y, Z)## is ## (x - X)^2 + (y - Y)^2 + (z - Z)^2##. In this case, ##(X, Y, Z) = (a, 0, 0) ##, so the square of the distance is ## (x - a)^2 + y^2 + z^2 = a^2 - 2 ax + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = a^2 - 2 a r \sin \theta \cos \phi + r^2 ##.

    Secondly, ## E = k dV /r_1^2 ## is the magnitude of the entire vector of the electric field. You need to find its component parallel with the x axis.

    Thinking about this some more, I believe it will be more convenient to place the point where the electric field is evaluated on the z-axis, also at distance ##a## from the origin. Then the square of the distance is ## a^2 - 2 ar \cos \theta + r^2 ##, which has no dependency on ## \phi ##. Then you need to find the component of the electric field in the direction of z.
     
  8. Nov 9, 2013 #7
    You are right. I wrote a2 + r2 - 2arcos(π/2 + θ)cos(ϕ). It should have been a2 + r2 - 2arcos(π/2 - θ)cos(ϕ) (since cos(π/2 - θ) = sin(θ)).

    But, if I try spherical coordinates, and try to get only the z-component, I get:

    k∫∫∫ cos(θ) r2 sin(θ)/ (a2 + r2[/SUP - 2arcos(θ)) = k∫∫∫ (r2 sin(2θ) / 2(a2 + r2 - 2arcos(θ))) dϕdθdr = 2kpi ∫∫ (r2 sin(2θ) / 2(a2 + r2 - 2arcos(θ))) dθdr

    Another integral that seems too complex for this course.

    Is there any clever trick I am missing? Or is there no easier way to do this?
     
  9. Nov 9, 2013 #8
    If you think you get the z-component by multiplying the magnitude by ## \cos \theta ##, you are mistaken.

    The E-field is directed along the displacement vector. The displacement vector is ## (-x, -y, a - z) ##. The unit vector in the direction of the displacement vector is $$

    \frac 1 {\sqrt{a^2 + r^2 - 2 a r \cos \theta }} (-x, -y, a - z)

    $$ Hence, the z-component of the field unit vector is $$

    \frac {a - z} {\sqrt{a^2 + r^2 - 2 a r \cos \theta }} = \frac {a - r \cos \theta } {\sqrt{a^2 + r^2 - 2 a r \cos \theta }}

    $$ Now that you have the magnitude of the field, and the z-component of the field unit vector, what is the z-component of the field?
     
  10. Nov 11, 2013 #9
    Right.. I always forget that there is supposed to be an r with a hat on it in the equation. In that case I get:

    EzdV = kp (a-rcos(θ)) r2 sin(θ)dθdrdϕ/ (a2 + r2 - 2arcos(θ))3/2

    Integrating that:

    2∏kp∫∫(a-rcos(θ)) r2 sin(θ)dθdr/ (a2 + r2 - 2arcos(θ))3/2

    I am again probably doing something wrong. I cant make the integral above become 2r/3.

    Also, why is the displacement vector (-x,-y,a-z)?
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2013
  11. Nov 12, 2013 #10
    The integrals look OK to me now. Try ## u = \cos \theta ##.

    The displacement vector is ## (-x, -y, a - z) ## because we evaluate the field due to the element at ## (x, y, z) ## at the point ## (0, 0, a) ##, hence the displacement is ##(0, 0, a) - (x, y, z) = (-x, -y, a - z)##.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Coulomb's law and spherical charge distribution
Loading...