Coulomb's Law: Attraction/Repulsion & Approximate Force Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyrax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the interaction between two parallel electric dipoles and the application of Coulomb's Law. Participants clarify that the dipoles repel each other due to the nature of their charges, despite initial confusion about potential diagonal attraction. For the force calculation, it's suggested to simplify the problem by treating the dipoles as four individual charges at the corners of a rectangle. The focus is on determining the net forces acting on each charge without needing exact equations for part a. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the basic principles of electric forces and their vector nature.
kyrax
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the two parallel electric dipoles shown.


+ (Q) + (Q) | (Distance=d/2)
------------------------------------------x------
- (-Q) - (-Q) | (Distance=d/2)
|-------Distance=X-----------|

a) Do the two dipoles attract or repel from each other
b) Let x>>d. Find an approximate expression for the force between the two dipoles. The expression is in terms of Q,d, and x.
C) sketch the graph of F vs. x.

Homework Equations


Coulombs's law
F=k(q1q2/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


I an completely new to Coulomb's law and dipoles so i don't know how to start.

a) The answer is they repel but i don't get why. I know the top/bottom two charges will repel but won't they attract each other diagonally?
b)Have not attempted. Don't know how to start.
c) Stuck on b. didnt get to this yet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guessing your diagram was supposed to look like this?
Code:
   + (Q)                        + (Q)
   |                            |      (Distance=d/2)
 --x----------------------------x-----------
   |                            |      (Distance=d/2)
   - (-Q)                       - (-Q)
   |-------Distance=x-----------|

Forget about the fact that they're dipoles. Just think about it as a set of four charges at the corners of a rectangle, and figure out the force on each charge. You don't need the exact magnitude and direction (at least not for part a), but you can easily figure out whether there's more force acting to the left or the right on any particular charge.
 
Last edited:
diazona said:
I'm guessing your diagram was supposed to look like this?
Code:
   + (Q)                        + (Q)
   |                            |      (Distance=d/2)
 --x----------------------------x-----------
   |                            |      (Distance=d/2)
   - (-Q)                       - (-Q)
   |-------Distance=x-----------|

Forget about the fact that they're dipoles. Just think about it as a set of four charges at the corners of a rectangle, and figure out the force on each charge. You don't need the exact magnitude and direction (at least not for part a), but you can easily figure out whether there's more force acting to the left or the right on any particular charge.

yes, it should look like that. thanks.

i don't know how to find the forces.
would it be like this? assuming the Q's are: Q1(top left), Q2(top right), -Q3(bottom left), -Q4(bottom right)

FQ1=[k(Q1Q2)/x2]+[k(Q1-Q3)/d2]+[k(Q1-Q4)/(x2+d2)]?

and i do this for Q2, -Q3, -Q4?
 
No equations needed for part a. Just think: the charge at the upper-left is repelled by one of the charges on the right and attracted by another. Which force is greater? Ditto for the charge at the lower-left.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top