Coupled nuclear decay rate equations

jmz34
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If we have the following partial decay chain:

N1 -> N2 -> N3 where N1 is the number of nuclei of species 1, etc.

and N1 -> N2, not via a decay but by the reaction such as N1 + neutron -> N2 + photon
and we know this rate of formation of N2, say 'a'.

I then get the following rate equation:

dN2(t)/dt=at-R2N2(t)=at-R2N2(0)exp(-R2t) where R2 is the decay rate from N2->N3

This would be simple to solve if the RHS wasn't coupled. By this I mean in a certain time, dt, there will be an increase in N2, dN2, which will couple into the N2(0) term and subsequently decay.

How would I go about solving this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're assuming that the rate of production of N2 is constant (i.e., the supply of N1 is constant) then you're really only dealing with one substance, N2, and its rate of production versus its rate of decay. So, dropping the "2" and just calling it "N",

dN/dt = a - rN

where r is the decay rate of substance N. This is a first order linear differential equation, namely

N' + rN - a = 0
 
Also I think your second equation seems to be wrong, I think I can see where you mistakenly got it from.

Just write a completely separate equation for dN3/dt
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top