Covariance equations of motion and symmetry

phoenixofflames
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I need to proof the covariance of the equations of motion under an infinitesimal symmetry transformation.

Homework Equations


Equations of motion:
<br /> E_i = \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^i}\right) - \partial_{\mu} \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^i_{\mu}}\right)<br />
Symmetry transformation
<br /> \delta \chi^i = \xi^{\alpha} (\chi)<br />
Lagrangian
<br /> L = L(F^a, \chi^{\alpha}, \chi^{\alpha}_{\mu})<br />

<br /> \chi^{\alpha}_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} \chi^{\alpha}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution

E_i &amp;= \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^i}\right) - \partial_{\mu} \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^i_{\mu}}\right)
= \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^{&#039;\alpha}}\right) \left(\frac{\partial \chi^{&#039;\alpha}}{\partial \chi^i}\right) - \partial_{\mu} \left[\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^{&#039; \alpha}_{\beta}}\right) \left(\frac{\partial \chi^{&#039; \alpha}_{\beta}}{\partial \chi^i_{\mu}} \right) \right]
= \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^{&#039;i}}\right) + \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^{&#039;\alpha}}\right)\left(\frac{\partial \xi^{\alpha}}{\partial \chi^i}\right) - \partial_{\mu} \left[\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^{&#039;i}_{\mu}}\right) + \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \chi^{&#039; \alpha}_{\mu}}\right) \left(\frac{\partial \xi^{\alpha}}{\partial \chi^i} \right)\right]
= E^{&#039;}_i + \left(\frac{\partial \xi^{\alpha}}{\partial \chi^i} \right) E_{\alpha}
at first order in xi.
The answer is
\delta E_i = - \left(\frac{\partial \xi^{\alpha}}{\partial \chi^i} \right) E_{\alpha}
I have no clue actually how to do this...
because L is a function of Chi, but I take the partial derivative towards chi' ,... Actually I have no clue how to do it mathematically correct..
Is it completely wrong or... Is there another way,..
Note that \delta L is not zero and doesn't need to be a complete derivative.

What does this covariance exactly mean?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Found it by using the action.

Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top