Curl and divergence of units vectos

Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Attachments

  • divergenceandcurl.jpg
    divergenceandcurl.jpg
    31.4 KB · Views: 881
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Jhenrique! Happy new year! :smile:
Jhenrique said:
I just know that

∇·x = 0
∇·y = 0
∇·z = 0

∇×x = 0
∇×y = 0
∇×z = 0

You can use those …

just write the other unit coordinates as functions of x y and z, and then apply ∇.

Show us what you get. :smile:​
 
I didn't make those calculus... someone already done?
 

Thread '##(A/\mathfrak{a})_{\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{a}}## and its isomorphism?'

I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Similar threads

Cross product between unit vectos
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Did I figure-out z-translation of 2D-coordinates correctly?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Find the divergence and curl of the given vector field
Replies
10
Views
1K
I Maxwell's equations PDE interdependence and solutions
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Curl operator for time-varying vector
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Dfns group action & group, written in terms of the other
Replies
26
Views
373
I Ampere's Law For Static Magnetic Field
Replies
5
Views
2K
I EM equations - am I missing something?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Electrodynamics, Curl of P and D
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Problem (c) for Discrete Value Ring
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top