Current Division: Find Load Resistor Current for 4 Resistors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marcin H
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Division
AI Thread Summary
To find the load resistor current using current division for four different resistors, the correct formula to apply is IL = (I_Norton * R_Norton) / (R_L + R_Norton). The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the load resistor and the Norton equivalent resistance. It highlights that if the load resistor is significantly larger than the Norton resistance, most current will flow through the Norton resistor, which must be considered in calculations. Modifications to the current division equation are necessary to accurately reflect these conditions. Understanding these principles is crucial for correctly applying current division in circuit analysis.
Marcin H
Messages
306
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Capture.JPG

Find the load resistor current for 4 different resistors.

Homework Equations


Current Division

The Attempt at a Solution


I need to use current division to find the load resistor current for 4 different resistors, but I am not sure how to apply it here. I have I_norton and R_norton and the RL is also given as one of the resistors (560ohms for example). How can I apply current division here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the current division is giving you issues? Have you applied the current division equation before? What are the important quantities you need to look at to apply current division?
 
axmls said:
What about the current division is giving you issues? Have you applied the current division equation before? What are the important quantities you need to look at to apply current division?
I haven't had much experience with it. Looking off an example from my notes, I think this would be it.

I_load= I_N(Rx/(Rx+RN)

Rx being the 560ohm resistor for example. Is that right?

EDIT: changed Rth to RN*******
 
I'm assuming Rth is your Norton resistor?

This isn't exactly correct, though the form is correct. To see why, let's assume you have the same circuit you have right now, but assume your load resistor is HUGE, and your norton equivalent resistance is small. Then qualitatively, you could see that most of the current would go through the Norton resistor (it's a path of less resistance). Then let's apply your current division equation to this situation to get the current through the load:
$$I_L = I_N \frac{R_L}{R_N + R_L}$$
But notice that this fraction is very close to ##1## (because the load resistor is huge and the Norton resistance is small), so this equation tells us that most of the current from the current source goes through the load, but obviously this can't be correct if the load resistance is much higher than the Norton resistance.

So, you'll have to make a modification to your current division equation.
 
axmls said:
So, you'll have to make a modification to your current division equation.

IL = (I_Norton*R_Norton/(RL + R_Norton))

Is that correct?
 
Correct. Just remember that with current division, the current is multiplied by the resistance of the branch whose current you don't want divided by the sum of the two branch resistances. Looking at extreme cases like I did above can help you to remember.
 
  • Like
Likes Marcin H
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top