Current Division Rule: Solving for Currents

  • Thread starter Thread starter jra12222
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Division
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for currents in a circuit using both the traditional V=IR method and the current division rule. The user initially found discrepancies between the two methods, leading to confusion about the conditions for applying the current division rule. They realized that additional components like capacitors and inductors require calculating impedance, which was a factor in their calculations. After some troubleshooting, the user identified a mistake in their value substitutions. The thread concludes with an acknowledgment of the importance of sharing work for clarity in problem-solving.
jra12222
Messages
17
Reaction score
6
Hi all,

I was working the following example:
upload_2018-12-2_5-57-40.png

where I need to find the currents. I tried solving using the traditional V=IR => I=V/R,
and then I tried with the current division rule. However with the current division rule the answers don't match.
Also according to the answers on the book the correct answer is the first one.
Are there some conditions when using the current division rule?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-2_5-57-40.png
    upload_2018-12-2_5-57-40.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 704
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know what the first one is since you didn't tell us. However, you have more than resistance in this circuit. Do you know how to get the impedance for a capacitor and an inductor?
 
Oh no the first is the traditional one, I basically found voltage drop across the the parallel branches and then found the current using V=I/Z.
Yes inductive and capacitive resistances are correct
 
OH never mind I just noticed I was making a mistake in the substitution of the values! I've been trying to figure it out for the past hour :(
Sorry for this!
Consider this thread closed
Thanks :)
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Tom.G
That's why we like people to post their working.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top