De Broglie wavelength of an electron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass, velocity, and de Broglie wavelength of an electron and an alpha particle with a kinetic energy of 2 MeV. A key point raised is the correct application of relativistic kinetic energy formulas, specifically distinguishing between invariant mass and effective mass. For the electron, the total energy is calculated as 2.51 MeV, indicating it is a relativistic particle, while the alpha particle, with a rest energy significantly higher than 2 MeV, is determined to be non-relativistic. Participants emphasize the importance of verifying whether a particle is relativistic before applying the corresponding equations. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate calculations in particle physics.
Cay
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm reposting this thread with some editing suggested by fresh_42:

1. Homework Statement

Calculate the mass, velocity and the de Broglie wavelength of an electron and an alpha particle, given the kinetic energy K = 2MeV

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



please find attached![/B]


I went through my calculations again and I think I have one problem in determining the formula of relativistic kinetic energy. What I used is: E = m*c^2, where m - the effective mass of the electron. I'm afraid I should've used
E = m*c^2 - m0*c^2, where m = m0/sqrt(1-β^2). Is that correct?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3671.jpg
    IMG_3671.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 612
Physics news on Phys.org
You're correct about the error. I prefer to use ##m## to refer to the invariant (rest) mass, but to avoid confusion I'll stick with your notation and terminology. So ##K = mc^2 - m_0c^2## or ##(m - m_0)c^2##.

Or you could just say the total energy is 2 MeV plus the rest energy of the electron, 0.511 MeV. So then ##mc^2 = 2.51## MeV. Go through all the same steps but using that value of total energy rather than the 2 MeV.
 
  • Like
Likes Cay
RPinPA said:
You're correct about the error. I prefer to use ##m## to refer to the invariant (rest) mass, but to avoid confusion I'll stick with your notation and terminology. So ##K = mc^2 - m_0c^2## or ##(m - m_0)c^2##.

Or you could just say the total energy is 2 MeV plus the rest energy of the electron, 0.511 MeV. So then ##mc^2 = 2.51## MeV. Go through all the same steps but using that value of total energy rather than the 2 MeV.
Thank you for replying!
However, if I apply the relativistic energy formula also for the alpha particle, I get that effective mass is approximately the same as the rest mass. So I would get that β=0, which is not possible. What am I doing wrong?
 
Cay said:
Thank you for replying!
However, if I apply the relativistic energy formula also for the alpha particle, I get that effective mass is approximately the same as the rest mass. So I would get that β=0, which is not possible. What am I doing wrong?

An alpha particle is two protons and two neutrons, each of which has a rest energy of approximately 1 GeV. So 2 MeV is a very small fraction of the rest energy and this particle is not relativistic. Use the low-velocity formula ##K = (1/2)mv^2##.

To be precise, the rest energy of an alpha is 3.727 GeV, so 2 MeV kinetic energy increases that to 3.729 GeV total energy. If you want to use the relativistic formula, the increase is a factor of 3.729/3.727 = 1.00054 = ##1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2}##. ##\beta## is indeed close to zero, meaning as I said this is not a relativistic particle and it is moving at a small fraction of ##c##.

In contrast, the electron has a total energy of 2.5 MeV which is nearly 5 times its rest energy, so that is definitely a relativistic particle.

It's often a good idea to first do a sanity check to see "is this a relativistic particle or not?"
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top