De Broglie wavelength of an electron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass, velocity, and de Broglie wavelength of an electron and an alpha particle with a kinetic energy of 2 MeV. A key point raised is the correct application of relativistic kinetic energy formulas, specifically distinguishing between invariant mass and effective mass. For the electron, the total energy is calculated as 2.51 MeV, indicating it is a relativistic particle, while the alpha particle, with a rest energy significantly higher than 2 MeV, is determined to be non-relativistic. Participants emphasize the importance of verifying whether a particle is relativistic before applying the corresponding equations. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate calculations in particle physics.
Cay
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm reposting this thread with some editing suggested by fresh_42:

1. Homework Statement

Calculate the mass, velocity and the de Broglie wavelength of an electron and an alpha particle, given the kinetic energy K = 2MeV

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



please find attached![/B]


I went through my calculations again and I think I have one problem in determining the formula of relativistic kinetic energy. What I used is: E = m*c^2, where m - the effective mass of the electron. I'm afraid I should've used
E = m*c^2 - m0*c^2, where m = m0/sqrt(1-β^2). Is that correct?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3671.jpg
    IMG_3671.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 614
Physics news on Phys.org
You're correct about the error. I prefer to use ##m## to refer to the invariant (rest) mass, but to avoid confusion I'll stick with your notation and terminology. So ##K = mc^2 - m_0c^2## or ##(m - m_0)c^2##.

Or you could just say the total energy is 2 MeV plus the rest energy of the electron, 0.511 MeV. So then ##mc^2 = 2.51## MeV. Go through all the same steps but using that value of total energy rather than the 2 MeV.
 
  • Like
Likes Cay
RPinPA said:
You're correct about the error. I prefer to use ##m## to refer to the invariant (rest) mass, but to avoid confusion I'll stick with your notation and terminology. So ##K = mc^2 - m_0c^2## or ##(m - m_0)c^2##.

Or you could just say the total energy is 2 MeV plus the rest energy of the electron, 0.511 MeV. So then ##mc^2 = 2.51## MeV. Go through all the same steps but using that value of total energy rather than the 2 MeV.
Thank you for replying!
However, if I apply the relativistic energy formula also for the alpha particle, I get that effective mass is approximately the same as the rest mass. So I would get that β=0, which is not possible. What am I doing wrong?
 
Cay said:
Thank you for replying!
However, if I apply the relativistic energy formula also for the alpha particle, I get that effective mass is approximately the same as the rest mass. So I would get that β=0, which is not possible. What am I doing wrong?

An alpha particle is two protons and two neutrons, each of which has a rest energy of approximately 1 GeV. So 2 MeV is a very small fraction of the rest energy and this particle is not relativistic. Use the low-velocity formula ##K = (1/2)mv^2##.

To be precise, the rest energy of an alpha is 3.727 GeV, so 2 MeV kinetic energy increases that to 3.729 GeV total energy. If you want to use the relativistic formula, the increase is a factor of 3.729/3.727 = 1.00054 = ##1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2}##. ##\beta## is indeed close to zero, meaning as I said this is not a relativistic particle and it is moving at a small fraction of ##c##.

In contrast, the electron has a total energy of 2.5 MeV which is nearly 5 times its rest energy, so that is definitely a relativistic particle.

It's often a good idea to first do a sanity check to see "is this a relativistic particle or not?"
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top