Debye internal energy for heat capacity

cristata
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working from Feynman's definition of internal energy for the Debye theory of heat capacity. I'm trying to use that to derive the normal definition of heat capacity that I've seen. But I'm running into a problem. Note, in the following V_0 is frequency, whereas V is volume (that's how Feynman writes it).

<br /> <br /> U=\frac{3Vk_{B}^{4}T^{4}}{2\pi^{2}\hbar^{3}V_{0}^{3}}\int_{0}^{\Theta_{D}/T}\frac{x^{3}e^{x}}{\left (e^x - 1\right )} dx<br /> <br />

<br /> = \frac{12\pi V k_{B}T^{4}}{\Theta_{D}^{3}}\int_{0}^{\Theta_{D}/T}\frac{x^{3}e^{x}}{\left (e^x - 1\right )} dx<br /> <br />

<br /> <br /> = \frac{4\pi V}{3}\frac{9k_{B}T^{4}}{\Theta_{D}^{3}}\int_{0}^{\Theta_{D}/T}\frac{x^{3}e^{x}}{\left (e^x - 1\right )} dx<br /> <br />

I get V = \frac{3N}{4 \pi}, in order to obtain

<br /> <br /> C_{V} =9Nk_{B}\left (\frac{T}{\Theta_{D}} \right)^{3}\int_{0}^{\Theta_{D}/T}\frac{x^{4}e^{x}}{\left (e^x - 1\right )^{2}} dx<br /> <br />

Why would V be this amount? I don't understand why this must be the case, unless I'm making a mistake somewhere, but I can't see where. The only way I can get the normal definition of Debye heat capacity is if I set V equal to this.

http://books.google.com/books?id=Ou...e+debye+temperature"&cd=1#v=onepage&q&f=false
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
how can i solve the integration in this equation?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top