Decibels and intensity of police car siren

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between sound intensity and decibels, particularly in the context of a police car siren. The original poster is trying to calculate how the sound intensity changes as the distance from the siren decreases from 200 meters to 50 meters, initially misapplying the logarithmic scale. Participants clarify that every doubling of distance results in a decrease of 6 dB, and the correct approach involves adding dB when moving closer to the sound source. Additionally, there is confusion about how decibels relate to intensity, with emphasis on the logarithmic nature of the scale. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying mathematical principles to sound intensity calculations.
Aphrael
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I am struggling with understanding the difference between decibels and intensity. I know that intensity can be measure in decibels but they are not always the same thing.

I have a problem where there is a police car 200 meters from an accident runing sirens at 80 decibels. I am asked to find how many decibels higher the sound intensity will be when the police car is only 50 meters away. Then I am asked to find how many cars are needed to match the sound of a rock concert (120 dB).

I tried using (I1/I2)=(R2/R1)^2 but I ended up getting 1200 dB which I knew could not be correct.

What should I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Decibels use a logorithmic scale. 10 decibel increment means intensity increased by a factor of 10.
 
You have the right idea in thinking about the inverse square relationship. You just didn't put it into a mathematical statement properly. If the distance is doubled, the intensity goes down by \frac{1}{2^2}. If the distance is tripled, the intensity goes down by \frac{1}{3^2}, etc...

Does that help?

EDIT: You'll need the hint from mathman too.
 
Last edited:
Okay I'm more confused now. I know about about the logorithmic scale thing. But I also know that since dB=10 log(I2/I1) Going down 3dB is equivalent to decreasing by a factor of two since 10 log(2)=dB. I also know that every 10dB the intensity doubles. So I don't understand how 10dB increases the intensity by 10. Please don't think I'm trying to say your wrong. I am just confused and want to show you my train of thought so you can tell me where I am wrong.

Also with the doubling, tripling distance thing...still confused. Are you saying I need to find the ratio between my two distances and then the total "R" equals the ratio squared?
 
Perhaps you can take a look at this link:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/acoustic/roomi.html#c1

Scroll down to where it talks about doubling the distance. You'll notice in your problem that you are doubling the distance twice, i.e. 50 to 100 ft and then 100 ft to 200 ft. For every doubling of the distance, the intensity decreases by 6 db. So your problem is simply going the other way. Instead of subtracting dB's from the source, you are adding.

Double check your calcs here:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/acoustic/isprob.html#c3
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top