Definite Integral Misunderstood

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of definite integrals, specifically the integral \(\int_2^4 2x \, dx\). Participants are exploring the relationship between the geometric interpretation of area under a curve and the process of antidifferentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss whether the integral represents the area under the line \(y=2x\) or the area under the curve \(x^2\). There are attempts to clarify the process of finding antiderivatives and evaluating definite integrals, with some questioning the relationship between the areas under different functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and its application to definite integrals. Some participants express confusion regarding the relationship between the areas under a function and its antiderivative, while others attempt to clarify these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints from their textbook instructions and the need to sketch regions to understand the signed area represented by the definite integrals. There is a recognition of potential misunderstandings stemming from the text.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
Okay, so I went a little ahead in my text and I am having alittle trouble deciphering something. To make it easy, I will provide an example/question.

If I see the following problem: [tex]\int_2^42xdx[/tex], does it mean

a.) Evaluate the line y=2x between 2 and 4 to get area=4.

or

b.) Antidifferentiate and evaluate the curve [tex]x^2[/tex] from 2 to 4 to get area=12.

C.) Neither.

Thank you,
Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If by a) you mean the area under the line y=2x between 2 and 4 then it means both. Except you got the answer to a) wrong. It's a trapezoid. The answer is also 12.
 
Okay...let me try this again in different words...I was trying to avoid an extremely wordy explanation, but here goes.

if you see this [tex]\int_a^b xdx[/tex] ...what do you do?

Casey
 
I find an antiderivative to x, which is x^2/2 and hence conclude the answer is b^2/2-a^2/2. What do YOU do?
 
Saladsamurai said:
Okay...let me try this again in different words...I was trying to avoid an extremely wordy explanation, but here goes.

if you see this [tex]\int_a^b xdx[/tex] ...what do you do?

Casey

The Fundamental Theorem of (Integral) Calculus says you would antidifferentiate x to get (1/2)(x^2) and then take the difference (1/2)(4^2) - (1/2)(2^2). It applies to any definite integral of f(x), *provided* the function is continuous on the interval between your integration limits. If the antiderivative (or integral) function of f(x) is F(x), then the definite integral from a to b is F(b)-F(a).

You'll learn somewhat later what to do if the function f(x) is *not* continuous...
 
Dick said:
If by a) you mean the area under the line y=2x between 2 and 4 then it means both. Except you got the answer to a) wrong. It's a trapezoid. The answer is also 12.

The answer is 12 for both...okay...I see where my error was.

Is that coincidence or are a function and its 1st derivative's areas under the same bounds supposed to be equal?! I don't think they are.

i.e, x from [0,3} =3 and its antiderivative x^2/2 from [0,3] = 9/2

I am more confused now. Can someone answer post #3 for me:confused:

Thanks,
Casey

Edit: I am too slow! Thanks dynamicsolo.SO is this correct to say:

[tex]\int_a^bxdx=(.5b^2)-(.5a^2)[/tex] =the area under the graph of y=x.<---or is it the area under .5x^2 from [a,b]? AHHH!

Edit again: I saw your post Dick. Thanks. I would stare at it for awhile and then go kick something...because the way I thought you did it was to evaluate .5x^2 from a to b ...however, my text appears to be doing something funny...maybe I am reading it wrong.
 
Last edited:
You are indeed royally confused. If F(x) is an antiderivative of f(x), then F(b)-F(a) is the area under the curve of f(x) between a and b. This is NOT equal to f(b)-f(a). And the area under F(x) is not equal to the area under f(x). It's only the first statement that is true. None of the others.
 
In reply:

[tex]\int_a^bxdx=(.5b^2)-(.5a^2)[/tex] =the area under the graph of y=x.
 
Dick said:
You are indeed royally confused. If F(x) is an antiderivative of f(x), then F(b)-F(a) is the area under the curve of f(x) between a and b. This is NOT equal to f(b)-f(a). And the area under F(x) is not equal to the area under f(x). It's only the first statement that is true. None of the others.

Okay. This is what I thought, so I was not confused by the Definite Integral, I must be confused by my textbook instructions.

Here is the problem exactly as stated.

Sketch the region whose signed area is represented by the definite integrand, and evaluate the inegral using an appropriate formula from geometry, where needed.

[tex]\int_0^3 xdx[/tex]


Ohhh @#$%...I get it. I can draw y=x and use .5(bh) to find the area of the triangle=9/2...OR...evaluate the antiderivative .5x^2 from [0,3] to get the same answer.

Casey
 
  • #10
Yessssssssssssssssss.
 
  • #11
Dick said:
Yessssssssssssssssss.

NOoooooooooooo.

































Just kidding. Yes.
 
  • #12
Don't scare me, I'm the sssssnake. I thought I was losing you again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K