Deflection of tapered beam cantilever

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the deflection of a tapered cantilever beam with a varying cross-section is feasible by deriving an equation based on the relationship between bending moment, material properties, and the moment of inertia. The fundamental equation involves integrating the bending moment over the varying inertia along the beam's length. Users can validate their derived results through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for accuracy. Empirical formulas from resources like Roark can also provide useful insights based on the beam's geometry. Engaging with these methods can yield a comprehensive understanding of the deflection behavior in tapered beams.
SJB
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi and thank you for taking a look at my problem..

I'm very familiar with doing deflection calculations for beams of constant cross-section but I find myself needing to now do calculations on a beam of varying cross-section and I'm completely lost.

It's a relatively simple case in that the beam is a round/tubular, constant/symmetrical taper. It's supported in cantilever at the large end and the load is a single point load at the tip. I've attached a simple sketch if it helps.

As a starting point, is it even possible to derive an equation for the deflection of the beam or can this only be calculated by FEA? (excuse my ignorance!)

If anyone can offer any help/pointers/equations I would be very grateful.

Thanks for your time.

Simon
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
This is certainly possible to derive eq'n of delection.

You will need to derive the deflection equation for you case, from equation:
E*I*d2y/dx2 = -M,where I is varying with position of section, and will be a function of x.
Therfore

E*d2y/dx2 = -M/Ix, and integrate this equation twice.

you will need to do this carefully and in the end you will get a big,scary expression of deflection.

You can definitely varify your result with FEA.

Take a look at Roark also for some empirical formula,depending upon ratio of both end area of inertias.
 
Hello Piygar,

Thank you for your reply, I'll give this a go and if successful will post back the equation in case it is useful to others.

Thanks

Simon
 
SJB: The cantilever tip deflection would be as follows, with x = 0 at the fixed support.

y_{\,\mathrm{max}}=\frac{1}{E}\int_{0}^{L}<br /> \int_{0}^{x}\frac{M(x)}{I(x)}\,dx\ dx
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top